اثر باکتری‌های تثبیت‌کننده نیتروژن و حل‌کننده فسفر بر برخی خصوصیات کمی و کیفی دو رقم ‏بگونیا (‏Begonia semperflorens‏)‏

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 استاد، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

3 استادیار، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این تحقیق بررسی اثر کودهای زیستی و تغذیه از طریق محلول غذایی (هوگلند پایه) بر خصوصیات کمی و کیفی دو رقم بگونیا همیشه‌گلدار (Senator deeprose و Sprint rose) صورت گرفت. آزمایش به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کامل تصادفی در بیست تیمار با سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها شامل، محلول غذایی (هوگلند پایه)، سودوموناس (Pseudomonas fluorescens Strain 169)،  ازتوباکتر (Azotobacter chroococcum Strain 12) و تلفیق سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و غلظت‌های مختلف محلول غذایی و دو رقم بگونیا بودند. عدم استفاده از کود زیستی و محلول غذایی، به‌عنوان شاهد در نظر گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین سطح برگ (69/36 میلی‌متر مربع) در کاربرد سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و 75 درصد نیتروژن مشاهده شد. بیشترین وزن تر شاخساره (18/117 گرم) و بیشترین وزن خشک شاخساره (12/4 گرم)، با کاربرد سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و 75 درصد نیتروژن و فسفر بود. همچنین بیشترین فسفر شاخساره (34/0 درصد) مربوط به تیمار سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و 100درصد فسفر بود و بیشترین کلروفیل‌های برگ‌ها (12/13 میلی‌گرم ‌درگرم ‌وزن‌تر) مربوط به تیمار ازتوباکتر و 100 درصد نیتروژن بود. تیمار سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و 75 درصد فسفر با 38/41 میلی‌گرم ‌درگرم ‌وزن‌تر بیشترین میزان آنتوسیانین‌های گلبرگ‌ها را داشت. در مجموع تیمار سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر و 75 درصد نیتروژن و سپس تیمار هوگلند پایه بهترین تیمار بودند. بر این اساس استفاده توأم باکتری سودوموناس و ازتوباکتر به همراه غلظت‌های کمتر عناصر غذایی منجر به بهبود معنی‌دار برخی صفات کمی و کیفی در بگونیا شد. ضمن اینکه دو رقم گل بگونیا Senator deeprose و Sprint rose در پاسخ به تیمارهای مشابه، واکنش متفاوتی از خود نشان دادند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on quantitative and ‎qualitative characteristics in two varieties of begonia (Begonia semperflorens‏(‏

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Khanideh 1
  • Moazzam Hassanpour Asil 2
  • Mohammadreza Ehteshami 3
1 M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, ‎Rasht, Iran ‎
2 Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran‎
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran ‎
چکیده [English]

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of biofertilizers and nutrition through a nutrient solution (base Hogland) on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Begonia semperflorens (two varieties, sprint rose and senator deeprose). The factorial experiment was carried out based on randomized complete block design (RCBD), with twenty treatments in three replications. Treatments include: nutrient solution (base Hogland), Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 169, Azotobacter chroococcum strain 12 and compound Pseudomonas and Azotobacter with different percentages of chemical fertilizer and two varieties of Begonia. Non-inoculated with nutrient solution and bio-fertilizer were considered as control. The results showed that the highest leaf area (36.69 mm2) was observed in Pseudomonas and Azotobacter and 75% of the nitrogen treatment. Maximum shoots fresh weight (117.18 gr) and maximum shoots dry weight (4.12 gr), were seen at the treatments of Pseudomonas and Azotobacter and 75% of the Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Most phosphorus in shoots (0.34%) was related to the treatments of Pseudomonas and Azotobacter and 100% phosphor and the highest chlorophyll of leaves (13.12 mg per gr of fresh weight) were related to the treatments of Azotobacter and 100% Nitrogen. Treatments of Pseudomonas and Azotobacter and 75% phosphor with 41.38 mg per gr of fresh weight, had the highest amounts of anthocyanins of petals. Overall, treatment of Pseudomonas and Azotobacter and 75% nitrogen, and then base Hogland treatment were the best treatments. Thus, it was shown that Pseudomonas and Azotobacter combination with reduced doses of nutrient solution, led to significant improvement of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Begonia. In addition, two varieties of Begonia (senator deeprose and sprint rose) in response to similar treatments, showed different reactions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Azotobacter
  • begonia
  • root inoculation
  • Pseudomonas‎

مراجع

  1. Abbasniayzare, S. Kh., Sedaghathoor, Sh. & Padasht Dahkaei, M. N. (2012). Effect of biofertilizer application on growth parameters of Spathiphyllum illusion. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(5), 669-673.
  2. Ali, A., Mehmood, T., Hussain, R., Bashir, A., Najam-uDin, S. R. & Ahmad, A. (2013). Investigation of biofertilizers influence on vegetative growth, flower quality, bulb yield and nutrient uptake in gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus ). International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences, 4(1), 94-99.
  3. Arcon, R., Barad, J. M. & Hayman, D. S. (1976). Utilization of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by plants inoculated with mycorrhiza fungi and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 8, 135-138.
  4. Banchio, B. & Giordano, W. (2013). Increase of secondary metabolite content in marigold by inoculationwith plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Applied Soil Echology, 70, 16-22.
  5. Banchio, E., Bogino, P. C., Zygadlo, J. & Giordano, W. (2008). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and essential oil yield in (Origanum majorana ). Biochemival Systematics and Ecology, 36, 766-771.
  6. Bhonde, S. R., Sharma, S. B. & Chougule, A. B. (1997). Effect of biofertilizer in combination with nitrogen through organic and inorganic sources on yield and quality of onion. National Horticulture Research Development Found, 7(2),1-3.
  7. Chapman, H. D., & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Method of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences.
  8. Deshmukh, M., Dalve, P. D., Dange, N. R. & Kawarkhe, V. J. (2009). Effect of biofertilizers with reduced doses of nitrogen on growth and flowering of gladiolus. International Journal of Agricultural Science, 5(4), 258-260.
  9. Dey, R., Pal, K. K., Bhatt, D. M. & Chuhan, S. M. (2004). Growth promotion and yield enhancement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea ) by application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiology Research, 159, 371-394.
  10. Dharni, S., Srivastava, A. K., Samad, A. & Dharani, D. P. (2014). Impact of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas monteilii PsF84 and Pseudomonas plecoglossicida PsF610 on metal uptake and production of secondary metabolite (monoterpenes) by rose-scented geranium (Pelargonium graveolens bourbon) grown on tannery sludge amended soil. Chemosphere, 117(2014), 433–439.
  11. Gadagi, R. S., Krishnaraji, P. V. & Kulkarni, J. H. (2004). The effect of combined Azospirillium inoculation and nitrogen fertilizer on plant growth promotion and yield response of the blanket flower Gaillardia pulchella. Science Horticulture, 100, 323-332.
  12. Gray, E. J. & Smith, D. L. (2005). Intracellular and extracellular PGPR commonalities and distinctions in the plant bacterium signalling processes. Soil Biology & Biochemistery, 37, 395-412.
  13. Hassanpour Asil, M., Mortazavi, S., Hatamzadeh, A. & Ghasemnezhad, M. (2012). Effects of gibberellic acid and calcium on reducing growth period of iris (Iris holandica Blue Magic) in greenhouse and extension of its cut flower life. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 3 (1), 63-72. (in Farsi).
  14. Hoagland, D. R. & Arnon, D. I. (1950). The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of California, Berkeley Circ, 347.
  15. Jeong, Y. K., CPasian, C., McMahon, M. & Tay, D. (2010). Response of six begonia species to fertilizer foncentration and fubstrate The Open Horticulture Journal, 3, 36-46.
  16. Kavino, M., Harish, S., Kumara, N., Saravanakumar, S. & Samiyappan, R. (2010). Effect of chitinolytic PGPR on growth, yield and physiological attributes of banana (Musa ) under field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 45, 71-77.
  17. Lashkari, M., Mahmoodi, S., Alikhani H. A. & Sayyari Zohan, M. H. (2021). Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescence strains and humic acid on some morphological and physiological characteristics of marshmallow (Altheae officinalis L.). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 52(3), 619-632. (in Farsi).
  18. Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembrans. Methods in Enzymology, 148, 350-382.
  19. Meyer, D. M. (2000). Pyoverdins: Pigments siderophores and potential taxanomic markers of fluorescent pseudomonas species. Microbiology, 174, 135-142.
  20. Mita, S., Murano, N., Akaike, M. & Nakamura, K. (1997). Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with pleiotropic effects on the expression of the gen for beta- amylase and on the accumulation of anthocyanin that are inducible by sugars. Plant Journal, 11, 84-851.
  21. Nabavi Mohajer, Z. S., Hassanpour Asil, M., Olfat, J. A. & Khaledian, M. (2018). Effect of macro elements concentration on quantitative and qualitative traits of lily cut flower (Lilium LA Hybrid Fangio) in soilless culture. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 50(1), 47-60. (in Farsi).
  22. Prasad, K., Aggarwal, A., Yadav, K. & Tanwar, A. (2012). Impact of different levels of superphosphate using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens on Chrysanthemum indicum. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 12(3), 451-462.
  23. Samah, A. M., Eweda, W. E., Girgis, M. G. Z. & Abdel-Ghany, B. F. (2014). Improving the productivity and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa) by using Azotobacter as N2 biofertilizer. Annals of Agricultural Science, 95(1), 95-108.
  24. Sharma, S. D., Kumarb, P., Bhardwajc, S. K. & Yadavd, Sh. K. (2011). Screening and selecting novel AM fungi and Azotobacter strain for inoculating apple under soil solarization and chemical disinfestation with mulch practices for sustainable nursery management. Scientia Horticulturae, 130(2011), 164-174.
  25. Srivastava, R., Preetham, S. P. & Chand, S. (2013). Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on vegetative floral and postharvest attributes in tuberose (Polianthes tuberose Shringer). Asian Journal of Biological and Life Sciences, 3(1), 6-9.
  26. Vessey, J. )2003). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil, 255, 571-586.
  27. Wahing, I., Van Vark, W., Houba, V. J. G. & Vanderlee, J. J. (1989). Soil and plant analysis, a series of syllabi. Part 7, plant analysis procedure. Wageningen Agricultural University.
  28. Yücel, C., Baloch, F. S. & Özkan, H. (2009). Genetic analysis of some physical properties of bread wheat grain (Triticum aestivum). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 33(6), 525-535.
  29. Zhang, M. Z., Yu, H. J., Zhou, Y. H., Yu, J. Q. & Xia, X. J. (2010). Photoprotective roles of anthocyanins in Begonia semperflorens. Plant Science, 179, 202-208.
علوم باغبانی ایران
دوره 53، شماره 3
آذر 1401
صفحه 615-628

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 بهمن 1395
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 دی 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 10 بهمن 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار