تأثیر کم‌آبیاری بر عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب در برخی رقم‌های سیب‌زمینی ‏‏(‏Solanum tuberosum L.‎‏) حاصل از تلاقی دای الل‏

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری، گروه علوم باغبانی و زراعی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

3 دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل (مغان)، سازمان ‏تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران

4 دانشیار، پژوهشگاه ملی مهندسی ژنتیک و زیست‌فناوری، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش به منظور ایجاد تنوع ژنتیکی و دستیابی به هیبریدهای مناسب از نظر صفات زراعی، بازارپسندی و سازگار با شرایط اقلیمی مناطق سیب­زمینی­خیز کشور و متحمل به کم­آبیاری، به مدت دو سال (1395 و 1396) در منطقه اردبیل انجام شد. آزمایش به صورت اسپلیت پلات بر پایه طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار انجام گرفت. کرت اصلی کم آبیاریدر سه سطح (100، 80 و 60 درصد نیاز آبی گیاه) و کرت فرعی شامل 12 جمعیت سیب‏زمینی بود. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد بین سطوح مختلف کم‌آبیاری، ژنوتیپ و اثرمتقابل بین آنها از لحاظ صفات تعداد و وزن غده در بوته، عملکرد غده، تعداد ساقه اصلی در بوته و طول استولون تفاوت معنی­دار و از لحاظ صفت درصد ماده خشک غده فقط بین ژنوتیپ­ها تفاوت معنی­دار مشاهده گردید. دراین آزمایش از 279 تلاقی موفق 244 هیبرید انتخاب گردید. هیبریدهای انتخاب شده دارای ۵/۹۷۵ گرم و ۵/۷ غده در بوته بودند. در هر سه شرایط محیطی بیشترین وزن غده در بوته و عملکرد غده مربوط به هیبرید آگریا♀ × کایزر♂ و در شرایط نرمال و تنش ملایم متعلق به هیبرید کایزر ♀ × ساوالان♂ بود. بیشترین کارایی مصرف آب در هر سه شرایط محیطی (100، 80 و 60 آب قابل استفاده) در هیبریدهای 2 ]آگریا (والد مادری) × کایزر (والد پدری)[ و 9 ]کایزر (والد مادری)× ساوالان (والد پدری)[ مشاهده گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of deficit irrigation on yield, yield component and water use efficiency in some ‎potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars from diallel crossing

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghasem Rahimi 1
  • Mohammad Reza Hassandokht 2
  • Davoud Hassanpanah 3
  • Amir Mousavi Mousavi 4
1 Ph.D. Graduate, Department of Horticulture Science and Agronomy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, ‎Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Horticulture‏ ‏Crops Research Department, Ardabil‏ ‏Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, ‎Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ardabil, Iran‎
4 Assocaite Professor, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This study was conducted for create genetic diversity and access to suitable hybrids in terms of agronomic traits, marketability and adaptation to climatic conditions and tolerance to water deficit stress in Ardabil region during two years (2017 and 2018). The experiment was splitplot based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications. The main plot was deficit irrigationat three levels (100, 80 and 60% of plant water requirement) and the sub plot consisted of 12 potato populations. Results of analysis of variance showed that there was significant difference between different levels of deficit irrigation, genotypes and their interactions in terms of number and weight of tuber per plant, tuber yield, number of main stems per plant and length of stolon and in terms of tuber dry matter percentage, only significant difference was observed between genotypes. In this experiment of the 279 successful crossings 244 hybrids were selected. Selected hybrids had an average of 975.5 g and 7.5 tubers per plant. In all three environmental conditions, the highest tuber weight per plant and tuber yield was related to ♂Agria × ♀Ceaser hybrid, and in normal and moderate stress conditionsbelonged to ♂Savalan × ♀Ceaser hybrid. The highest water use efficiency was observed in all three environmental conditions in hybrids 2 [Agria (mother parent) × Caeser (mother parent)] and 9 [Caeser (mother parent) × Savalan (father parent)].

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hybrid
  • quantitative and qualitative traits
  • tuber dry matter
  1. Akbari Nodehi, D. (2011). Evaluating soybean response to water stress at different growth stages in Mazandaran province. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1(1), 53-61.
  2. Ayas, S. (2013). The effects of different regimes on potato (Solanum tuberosum Hermes) yieldand quality characteristics under unheated greenhouse conditions. Bulgarian Journal of AgriculturalScience, 19, 87-95.
  3. Ayas, S. & Korukcu, A. (2010). Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 24 (2), 23-26.
  4. Bolandi, E.R. &Hamidi, H. (2016). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of 18 potato clones. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(2), 328-318. (In Farsi).
  5. Eskandari, A., Khuzai, HR, Nezami, A. & Kafi, M. (2011). Study of the Impact of irrigation regime on yield and some qualitative properties of three potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum).Journal of Soil and Water Science and Agriculture, 25 (2), 247-240.
  6. Evers, D., Lefevre, I., Legay, S., Lamoureux, D., Hausman, J.F., Rosales, R. O., Tincopa Marca, L.R., Hoffmann, L., Bonierbale, M. & Schafleitner, M. (2010). Identification of drought-responsive compounds in potato through a combined transcriptomic and targeted metabolite approach. Journal of experimental botany, 61, 2327-2343.
  7. Fallahi, M. (1997). Potato knowledge and technology. Parsada Publications. 250 pp.
  8. Hasanpanah, D. & Akbarloo, H. (2013). Cultivation and processing of edible and seed potatoes. Daneshneghar. 224 p.
  9. Hasanpanah, D., HasanAbadi, H., Hosseinzadeh, A., Soheili, B. & Mohammadi, R. (2016). Factor analysis, AMMI stability value parameter and GGE Bi-plot graphical method for quantitative and qualitative traits of potato genotypes. Ecophysiology of Crops, 37 (3), 748-731.
  10. Hassanpanah, D. & Hassanabadi, (2011). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of promising potato clones in Ardabil region, Iran. Modern Science of Sustainable Agriculture Journal, 7, 37-48. (In Farsi).
  11. Hassanpanah, D. & Hassanabadi, H. (2012). Evaluation of quantitative, qualitative and tuber yield stability of 18 promising potato clones in Ardabil province. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 8, 219-234. (In Farsi).
  12. Heidari Roodbali, M., Abdolshahi, R., Baghizadeh, A. & Ghaderi, M. (2016). Genetic analysis of yield and yield related traits in bread wheat Triticum aestivum under drought stress condition. Crop Breeding Journal, 18, 1-6.
  13. Heidari Sarban, B. (2016). Evaluation of water deficit tolerance in seedlings of potato cultivars treated with polyethylene glycol and plant growth promoting bacteria under in vitro conditions. M.Sc. in Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil Branch. 110 p. (in Farsi).
  14. Hemati, I, Sabaghpour, S. H.,Taeb, M., & Choukan, R. (2010). Study on genetic parameters for different agronomic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes using diallel analysis. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal, 26-1(2), 205-218.(In Farsi).
  15. Jafari, F., Panahandeh, J., Motallebi-Azar, A.R. & Torabie-Giglou, M. (2019). Response of potato’s cultivars and promising clones to osmotic and temperature stress under in vitro conditions. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 50(3), 633-648. (In Farsi).
  16. Jahani Jelodar, Y., Barzegar, T., Hassanpanah, D. & Ghahremani, Z. (2021). Evaluation of tuber yield and some quantitative and qualitative traits of 15 promising potato genotypes in Ardebil region. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 52(2), 293-303. (In Farsi).
  17. Jensen, C. R., Battilani, A., Plauborg, F., Psarras, G., Chartzoulakis, K., Jovanovic, Z., Li, G. & Andersen, M. N. (2010). Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signaling in potatoes and tomatoes.Agricultural Water Management, (98), 403-413.
  18. Kazemi, H. (2003). Principles of farming. Tabriz University Press, 520p.
  19. Khandan, A., Hassanabadi, H. & Sepahvand, N.A. (2011). National guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability in potato. Seed and Plant Certification & Registration Institute, 40 pp, (In Farsi).
  20. Khorshidi Benam, M. B., Rahimzadeh Khoi, F., Mirhadi, M. J. & Nour Mohammadi, A. H. (2002). Investigation of drought stress effects on growth stages of different potato cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 4 (1), 48-59.
  21. Koech, O. K., Kinuthia, R. N., Karuku, G. N., Mureithi, S. M. & Wanjogu, R. (2015). Water use efficiency of sixrangeland grasses under varied soil moisture content levels in the arid Tana River County, Kenya.African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 9(7), 632-640.
  22. Landjeva, S., Neumann, K., Lohwasser, U. & Börner, A. (2008). Molecular mapping of genomic regions associated with wheat seedling growth under osmotic stress. Biologia Plantarum, 52, 259-266.
  23. Lian xu, H., Qin, F., Xu, Q., Tan, J. & Liu, G. (2011). Application of xerophytophysiology in plantproduction- The potato crop improved by partial root zone drying of early season but not whole season.Scientia Horticulturae, (129), 528-534.
  24. Maralian, H., Nasrollahzadeh, S., Raiyi, Y. & Hassanpanah, D. (2014). Responses of potato genotypes to limitedirrigation. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research, 5 (5), 13-19.
  25. Mohadese Servani, M., Hamid Reza Mobasser, H. R. & Ganjali. H. R. (2014). Influence of drought stress onphotosynthetic, radical oxygen, respiration, assimilate partitioning, activities of enzymes, phytohormones andessential oils in crop plants. International Journal of Biosciences, 5(8), 223-236.
  26. Moradi, F., Golchin, A. & Abdollahi, S. (2017). Investigating the effect of growth hormones on potato gland function, Agria Cv., 15th Iranian Soil Science Congress, Isfahan, 28August, 2017. (In Farsi).
  27. Mousapour Gorji, A., Hassanpanah, D. & Ahmadvand, R. (2021). The comparison of the physico-chemical properties and tuberization date of advanced clones and commercial potato cultivars. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 52(2), 473-48. (In Farsi).
  28. Naeem, A. &Atrashi, M. (2014). Investigation of the effect of plant growth bacteria and fungi on growth yield and some growth parameters of three potato cultivars (Solanum tuberosum). Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 4(13), 48-37.
  29. Nickmanesh, L. & Hassanpanah, D. (2014). Evaluation of genetic diversity for agronomic traits in 127 potato hybrids with using multivariate statistical methods. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(2), 502-507.
  30. Nouri, A., Nezami, A., Kafi, M. & Hassanpanah, D. (2016). Evaluation of water deficit tolerance of 10 potato cultivars based on some physiological traits and tuber yield in Ardabil region. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10(1), 268-243. (In Farsi).
  31. Passioura, J.B. (2007). The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural
    Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 113-117.
  32. Sadeghi, F. (2014). Estimation of genetic structure of yield and yield components in bread wheat Triticum aestivum using diallel method. Crop Breeding Journal, 13, 101-113.
  33. Sepaskhah, A. R. & Ahmadi, S. H. (2010). A review on partial root zone drying irrigation. InternationalJournal of Plant Production, 4(4), 241-259.
  34. Taheri Tarigh, S., Zarbaksh, A. J. & Mousapour Gorji, A. (2007). Evaluation of genetical
    diversity and correlations among traits in different populations of potato. Agricultural
    Sciences Journal
    , 13(1), 131-141. (In Farsi).
  35. Yaghoubi, H. &Javadi, A.S. (2013). Barriers to organic crop production from the viewpoints of sgricultural Jihad experts. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 24(1), 68-57. (In Farsi).
  36. Yuan, B. Z., Nishiyama, S. & Kang, Y. (2003). Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth andyield of drip irrigated potato. Agricultural Water Management, (63), 153-167.
  37. Zakerhamidi, S. & Hassanpanah, D. (2014). Investigation of genetic diversity for quantitative traits in 166 potato hybrids of produced from Luca and Caesar cultivars crosses. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 3(12), 34-37.