تأثیر کاربرد کود زیستی حاوی باکتری ‏Pantoea agglomerans‏ در مقایسه با کود اوره بر رشد و ‏کیفیت چمن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

2 استادیار، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

3 استاد، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

چکیده

کاربرد کودهای زیستی سازگار با محیط زیست و جایگزینی آن با کودهای شیمیایی می­تواند به­عنوان یکی از گزینه­های مدیریت تغذیه‌ای چمن مطرح باشد. در این پژوهش تأثیر کاربرد کود زیستی محتوی باکتری Pantoea agglomerans بر رشد و کیفیت چمن و مقایسه آن با کود اوره مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. این آزمایش روی چمن اسپیدی گرین در گلدان و در گلخانه با چهار تیمار کشت چمن به روش متعارف (Gr)، کاربرد کود اوره معادل 100 کیلوگرم در هکتار (GrU)، کاربرد باکتری تثبیت‌کننده نیتروژن Pantoea agglomerans (GrPA)، کاربرد باکتری Pantoea agglomerans و باکتری­های تنظیم کننده رشد (GrPP) و در سه تکرار انجام شد. طبق نتایج، بیشترین وزن ‌تر در تیمار GrU مشاهده شد. تیمارهای GrPA و GrPP نیز بعد از تیمار اوره تأثیر مثبت بر وزن‌ تر گیاه داشتند. کارایی کود زیستی بر مبنای وزن خشک، در تیمار GrPA و GrPP به ترتیب برابر با 9/32 و 6/11 درصد بود. به­ کار بردن کود زیستی محتوی Pantoea agglomerans به تنهایی یا همراه با باکتری­های محرک رشد سبب افزایش معنی­دار کیفیت ظاهری چمن نسبت به تیمار شاهد شد، اما از تیمار کود اوره کمتر بود. کودهای زیستی همچنین در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد سبب افزایش غلظت نیتروژن، پتاسیم، منگنز و روی در برگ­های چمن شدند. به طور کلی بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش کاربرد باکتری Pantoea agglomerans به عنوان یک تثبیت‌کننده نیتروژن تأثیر مثبتی بر رشد و کیفیت چمن دارد و می­توان از آن به عنوان جایگزین بخشی از کود اوره استفاده نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of application of bio-fertilizer containing Pantoea agglomerans compared ‎to urea fertilizer on growth and quality of turfgrass

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nadia Emami 1
  • Akbar Hassani 2
  • Ali Reza Vaezi 3
  • Mohammad BabaAkbari sari 2
1 M. Sc. Graduate, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
3 Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The use of environmentally friendly biofertilizers and their replacement with chemical fertilizers can be one of the options for grass nutrition management. In this study the effect of Pantoea agglomerans bacteria on growth and quality of grass and its comparison with urea fertilizer was investigated. This experiment was carried out in greenhouse in pots with four treatments of turfrass cultivation in a conventional way as control (Gr), application of urea equivalent to 100 kg/ha (GrU), application of nitrogen fixing bacteria of Pantoea agglomerans (GrPA), and application of nitrogen fixing bacteria of Pantoea agglomerans + PGPR (GrPP) with three replications. The results showed that the highest fresh weight was observed in GrU treatment. GrPA and GrPP treatments also had a positive effect on fresh weight after urea treatment. Biofertilizer efficiency for dry weight in GrPA and GrPP treatments was 32.9 % and 11.6 %, respectively. Application of biofertilizer containing Pantoea agglomerans alone or in combination with growth promoting bacteria increased the appearance of grass compared to the control treatment, but was less than urea treatment.  Biofertilizers also increased the concentrations of nitrogen, potassium, manganese and zinc in the leaves compared with the control treatment. In general, the results of this study showed that the use of Pantoea agglomerans as a nitrogen fixing bacteria has a positive effect on the growth and quality of grass and it can be used as a partial substitute for urea fertilizer.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nitrogen fixing bacteria
  • plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
  • PGPR
  • sport grass‎

مراجع

  1. Acikgoz, E., Bilgili, U., Sahin, F. & Guillard, K. (2016). Effect of plant growth-promoting Bacillus on color and clipping yield of three turfgrass species. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 39(10), 1404-1411.
  2. Amirabadi, M., Seifi, M., Rejali, F. & Ardakani, M. R. (2012). Study the concentration of macroelements in forage mays (Zea mays) (SC 704) as effected by inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi and Azotobacter chroococcum under different levels of nitrogen. Agroecology, 4(1), 33-40. (in Farsi).
  3. Amiri, M. B., Moghaddam, P. R., Ghorbani, R., Fallahi, J., Fard, R. D. & Poor, F. F. (2013). Effects of Seed Priming by Biofertilizers on Growth Characteristics of three Wheat Cultivars at the Emergence Period under Greenhouse Conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 11(1), 64-72. (in Farsi).
  4. Asghari, J., Ehteshami, S. M. R., Rajabi Darvishan, Z., & Khavazi, K. (2014). Study of Root Inoculation with Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) and Spraying with Their Metabolites on Chlorophyll Content, Nutrients Uptake and Yield in Rice (Hashemi cultivar). Journal of Sol Biology, 2(1), 21-31. (in Farsi).
  5. Bernal, P., Allsopp, L. P., Filloux, A. & Llamas, M. A. (2017). The Pseudomonas putida T6SS is a plant warden against phytopathogens. The ISME Journal, 11(4), 972.
  6. Biari, A., Gholami, A. & Rahmani, H. A. (2011). Effect of Different Plant Growth Promotion Bacteria (Azotobacter, Azospirillum) on Growth Parameters and Yield of Field Maize. Journal of Water And Soil, 25(1), 1-10. (in Farsi).
  7. Braun, R. & Bremer, D. (2017). Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass: Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization (Year 2). Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, 3(4), 10-10.
  8. Cakmakci, R., Dönmez, M. F. & Erdoğan, Ü. (2007). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31(3), 189-199.
  9. Çakmakçı, R., Dönmez, M. F., Ertürk, Y., Erat, M., Haznedar, A. & Sekban, R. (2010). Diversity and metabolic potential of culturable bacteria from the rhizosphere of Turkish tea grown in acidic soils. Plant and Soil, 332(1-2), 299-318.
  10. Caron, M., Patten, C., Ghosh, S. & Glick, B. (1995). Effects of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 on the physiology of canola roots. In: Proceedings of Plant Growth Regulator Soiety of America Annual Meetingو 22, 297-302.
  11. Christians, N. E., Patton, A. J., & Law, Q. D. (2016). Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management: John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
  12. Cole, H. V., Triguero-Mas, M., Connolly, J. J. & Anguelovski, I. (2019). Determining the health benefits of green space: Does gentrification matter? Health &Place, 57, 1-11.
  13. Dneshvar Hakimi Meybodi, N., Kafi, M., Nikbakht, A. & Rejali, F. (2012). The Effect of Humic Acid on Some Qualitative and Quantitative Traits of Speedygreen Turfgrass. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 42(4), 403-412.
  14. Dobbelaere, S., Croonenborghs, A., Thys, A., Ptacek, D., Okon, Y. & Vanderleyden, J. (2002). Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum brasilense and irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake of spring wheat and grain maize. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 36(4), 284-297.
  15. Dordipour, E., Farshadirad , A. & Arzanesh, M. H. (2011). Effect of Azotobacter chrococoum and Azospirillum lipoferum on the release of soil potassium in pot culture of soybean (Glycine max Williams). Agroecology, 2(4), 593-599. (in Farsi).
  16. Dursun, A., Ekinci, M. & Dönmez, M. F. (2010). Effects of foliar application of plant growth promoting bacterium on chemical contents, yield and growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(5), 3349-3356.
  17. Dutkiewicz, J., Mackiewicz, B., Lemieszek, M. K., Golec, M. & Milanowski, J. (2015). Pantoea agglomerans: a mysterious bacterium of evil and good. Part I. Deleterious effects: Dust-borne endotoxins and allergens–focus on cotton dust. Annals of Agricaltural Environment Medicine, 22(4), 576-588.
  18. Esitken, A., Yildiz, H. E., Ercisli, S., Donmez, M. F., Turan, M. & Gunes, A. (2010). Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry. Scientia Horticulturae, 124(1), 62-66.
  19. Feng, Y., Shen, D. & Song, W. (2006). Rice endophyte Pantoea agglomerans YS19 promotes host plant growth and affects allocations of host photosynthates. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 100(5), 938-945.
  20. Gholamipour Fard, K., Zakizadeh, H., Ghasemnezhad, M., Kafi, M. & Rejali, F. (2018). The study of morphological and biochemical responses of some mycorrhizae-inoculated turfgrass species to lead stress. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 49(1), 57-68.
  21. Hamidi, A., Chookan, R., AsgharZadeh, A., DehghanShoar, M., Ghalavand, A. & Malakouti, M. (2011). Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Dry Matter Partitioning of Late Maturing Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41(4), 665-675. (in Farsi).
  22. Hokmalipour, S. (2017). Evaluate the effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and some agronomic and physiological traits of medicinal plant of Peppermint (Mentha piperita). Journal of Plant Ecophysiology, 9(28), 133-144. (in Farsi).
  23. Jacobson, C. B., Pasternak, J. & Glick, B. R. (1994). Partial purification and characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 40(12), 1019-1025.
  24. Kalra, Y. (1997). Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. London: CRC press.
  25. Karakurt, H. & Aslantas, R. (2010). Effects of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on plant growth and leaf nutrient content of apple. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 18(1), 101-110.
  26. Karlidag, H., Esitken, A., Turan, M. & Sahin, F. (2007). Effects of root inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrient element contents of leaves of apple. Scientia Horticulturae, 114(1), 16-20.
  27. Kuo, Y. (2015). Effects of fertilizer type on chlorophyll content and plant biomass in common Bermuda grass. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(42), 3997-4000.
  28. Maggiotto, S., Webb, J., Wagner-Riddle, C. & Thurtell, G. (2000). Nitrous and nitrogen oxide emissions from turfgrass receiving different forms of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(2), 621-630.
  29. Mirshekari, B., Baser, S., & Javanshir, A. (2009). Effect of seed inoculation with nitragin and different levels of urea on physiological traits and biologic yield of maize, cv. 704 grown in cold and semi-arid regions. New Finding in Agriculture, 3(4), 403-411. (in Farsi).
  30. Mokhtari, M. & Besharati, H. (2013). Effect of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria on Yield and Chemical Composition of Corn Plants. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 27(4), 619-628. (in Farsi).
  31. Morris, K. (2002). National bentgrass (fairway/tee) tests 1999-2002 data. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, Beltsville, Maryland. Yield. Comm. Soil Plant Analysis, 38, 921-933.
  32. Najafi, N., Parsazadeh, M., Tabatabaei, S. & Oustan, S. (2014). Effects of Nitrogen Form and pH of Nutrient Solution on the Uptake and Concentrations of Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium and Sodium in Root and Shoot of Spinach Plant. Water and Soil Science, 20(2), 111-131. (in Farsi)
  33. Patten, C. L. & Glick, B. R. (2002). Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and environmental microbiology, 68(8), 3795-3801.
  34. Potrikus, C. & Breznak, J. A. (1977). Nitrogen-fixing Enterobacter agglomerans isolated from guts of wood-eating termites. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 33(2), 392-399.
  35. Sheng, X. (2005). Growth promotion and increased potassium uptake of cotton and rape by a potassium releasing strain of Bacillus edaphicus. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(10), 1918-1922.
  36. Stockwell, V., Johnson, K., Sugar, D. & Loper, J. (2002). Antibiosis contributes to biological control of fire blight by Pantoea agglomerans strain Eh252 in orchards. Phytopathology, 92(11), 1202-1209.
  37. Sumanta, N., Haque, C. I., Nishika, J. & Suprakash, R. (2014). Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from commonly grown fern species by using various extracting solvents. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 4(9), 63-69.
  38. Validov, S., Kamilova, F., Qi, S., Stephan, D., Wang, J., Makarova, N. & Lugtenberg, B. (2007). Selection of bacteria able to control Fusarium oxysporum sp. radicis‐lycopersici in stonewool substrate. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 102(2), 461-471.
  39. Vance, C. P. (1997). Enhanced agricultural sustainability through biological nitrogen fixation. Biological fixation of nitrogen for ecology and sustainable agriculture, 39, 179-186.
  40. Verma, S. C., Ladha, J. K. & Tripathi, A. K. (2001). Evaluation of plant growth promoting and colonization ability of endophytic diazotrophs from deep water rice. Journal of Biotechnology, 91(2), 127-141.
  41. Xie, H., Pasternak, J., & Glick, B. R. (1996). Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Current Microbiology, 32(2), 67-71.
  42. Yao, L., Wu, Z., Zheng, Y., Kaleem, I., & Li, C. (2010). Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. European Journal of Soil Biology, 46(1), 49-54.
  43. Yousefzadeh, S., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M., Sefidkon, F., Asgarzadeh, A., Ghalavand, A., Roshdi, M., & Safaralizadeh, A. (2013). Effect of biofertilizer, azocompost and nitrogen on morphologic traits and essential oil content of Dracocephalum moldavica in two regions of Iran. Scientific Journal Management System, 29(2), 438-459. (in Farsi).
علوم باغبانی ایران
دوره 52، شماره 2
شهریور 1400
صفحه 341-351

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 09 دی 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 23 دی 1398

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار