تأثیر سطوح مختلف شوری در فراسنجه‌های فیزیولوژیکی برخی پایه‌های پیوندی گلابی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد، بخش تحقیقات باغبانی، مؤسسۀ تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیۀ نهال و بذر، کرج

چکیده

به‌منظور تعیین تأثیر سطوح مختلف شوری (شاهد با هدایت الکتریکی 8/0، 6/1، 4/2، 2/3 و 4 دسی‌زیمنس بر متر) با استفاده از نمک کلرور سدیم روی فراسنجه (پارامتر)های فیزیولوژیکی و شاخص‌های رشد (طول و قطر) در سه رقم دره گزی، لوییزبون و ویلیام دوشس که روی پایه‌های گلابی بذری، OHF69 و Pyrodwarf پیوند شده بودند. پژوهشی در قالب طرح آماری بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی به‌صورت فاکتوریل و در کشت گلدانی مستقر در باغ تحقیقاتی کمال‌آباد کرج در سال 1394 به اجرا گذاشته شد. در این پژوهش برای صفات مورد بررسی از شاخص‌های مختلف حساسیت و تحمل به تنش شوری استفاده شد. در نهایت با استفاده از شاخص میانگین رتبه‌بندی و انحراف معیار بر مبنای همۀ شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری‌شده، حساس‌ترین و متحمل‌ترین نهال به شوری معرفی شد. نتایج نشان داد که در بین صفات مورد بررسی روند کاهشی سبزینه (کلروفیل) یا ارزش SPAD با افزایش شوری بیشتر از دیگر صفات (20درصد کاهش در شرایط شور) بود. در بین نهال‌های مورد بررسی، در شرایط شور نهال پیوندی لوییزبون× بذری برتری نسبی از نظر طول، قطر تنه، FV/FM و میزان سبزینه یا ارزش SPAD در مقایسه با دیگر نهال­ها نشان داد. همچنین نهال لوییزبون× پیرودوارف در شرایط شور، کاهش بیشتری در فراسنجه‌های طول و قطر تنه، سطح برگ، FV/FM و سبزینه یا ارزش SPAD مقایسه با دیگر نهال­ها نشان داد. در این پروژه نهال لوییزبون*بذری به عنوان متحمل ترین و نهال لوییزبون× پیرودوارف به عنوان حساس ترین نهال به شوری شناخته شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of salinity on physiological aspects of some grafted-pear rootstocks

نویسنده [English]

  • Mitra Mirabdulbaghi
Professor, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In order to determine the effect of different levels of salinity (EC=1.6, 3.2, 4 and 0.8 dS/m as  control) using sodium chloride on physiological parameters  and also some growth indices in the three grafted-pear rootstocks (OHF69, pyrodwarf and one seedling rootstock) in grafting with Daregazi, Louise Bonne and William Duchesse scions, a pot experiment was carried out as factorial arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Horticulture research station of Kamalabad/Karaj in spring of 2015. In the present work, different indices of susceptibility and tolerance for all studied parameters were identified and also rank mean (Ṝn) and standard deviation of ranks (SDR) of all mentioned parameters were measured. Results of this study showed that among all studied parameters the reduction of chlorophyll or SPAD value (20% reduction in saline conditions) was higher than other parameters. Among all grafted-pear rootstocks, seedling rootstock in grafting with Louise bonne showed comparative advantage in terms of length, diameter, FV/FM and the amount of chlorophyll or SPAD value compared to other grafted-pear rootstocks. Also, pyrodwarf rootstock in grafting with Louise bonne showed in saline conditions, further reducing the parameters of length, diameter, leaf area, Fv/Fm and chlorophyll or SPAD value compared to other grafted-pear rootstocks. In the present work, seedling rootstock in grafting with Louise Bonne was identified as the most salt tolerant between studied grafted-pear rootstocks, while pyrodwarf rootstock in grafting with Louise Bonne as the most sensitive.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Grafted-pear rootstocks
  • physiological parameters
  • salinity
  • tolerance indices

مراجع

  1. Barbagallo, R. P., Oxborough, K., Palette, K. E. & Baker, N. R. (2003). Rapid, non-invasive screening for perturbations of metabolism and plant growth using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiology, 132, 485-493.
  2. Bhardway, R. & Singhal, G. (1981). Effect of water stress on photochemical activity of chloroplasts during greening etiolated barley seedling. Plant Cell Physiology, 22(2), 155-162.
  3. Bolat, I., Kaya, C., Almaca, A. & Timucin, S. (2006). Calcium sulfate improve salinity tolerance in rootstock of plum. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29, 553-564.
  4. Bouslama, M. & Schapaugh, W. T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24, 933-937.
  5. Cheeseman J. M. (1988). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiology, 87, 57-550.
  6. Clark, J. M., Depauw, R. M. & Townley–Smith, T. F. (1992). Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 32, 723-728.
  7. Clark, J. M., Townley–Smith, T. F., McCaig, T. N. & Green, D. G. (1984). Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varying drought resistance. Crop Science, 24, 537-541.
  8. Duran-Zuazo, V. H., Martinez-Raya, H. & Aguilar-Ruiz, J. (2003). Salt tolerance of mango rootstock (Magnifera indica L. cv.Osteen). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(1), 67-78.
  9. Fallahi, S. H. (1998). Detailed soil and land classification studies at Kamalabad Research Station (Karaj). Technical Journal of Soil and Water Research Institute. ???????.
  10. Farshadfar, E. & Elyasi, P. (2012b). Screening quantitative indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) landraces, European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2(3), 577-584
  11. Farshadfar, E., Elyasi, P. & Aghaee, M. (2012a). In Vitro selection for drought tolerance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by mature embryo culture, American Journal of Science, Research, 48, 102-115.
  12. Fernandez, G. C. J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of adaptation for food crops to temperature and water stress symposium. Taiwan. pp. 257-270.
  13. Fernandez, R. J. & Reynolds, J. F. (2000). Potential growth and drought tolerance of eight desert grasses. Journal of Ecologia, 123, 90-98.
  14. Fisarakis, I., Nikolaou, N., Tsikalas, P., Therios, I. & Stavrakas, D. (2004). Effect of salinity and rootstock on concentration of potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and nitrate-nitrogen in Thompson seedless grapevine. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 12, 2117-2134.
  15. Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897-912.
  16. Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897-912.
  17. Garcia-Sanchez, F. & Syvertsen, J. P. (2006). Salinity tolerance of Cleopatra mandarin and carrizo citrange citrus rootstock seedlings is affected by CO2 enrichment during growth. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 131, 24-31.
  18. Garcia-Sanchez, F., Syvertsen, J. P., Martinez, V. & Melgar, J. C. (2006). Salinity tolerance of “Valencia” orange trees on rootstocks with contrasting salt tolerance is not improved by moderate shade. Journal of Experimental Botany, 121, 1-10.
  19. Gavuzzi, P., Rizza, F., Palumbo, M., Campaline, R. G., Ricciardi, G. L. & Borghi, B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77, 523-531.
  20. Homaii, M. (2002). The reaction of plants to salinity. First edition, National Iranian Irrigation and Drainage Committee Publication. No. 58, Tehran
  21. Khalili, M., Naghavi, M. R., Pour Aboughadareh, A. R. & Talebzadeh, J. (2012). Evaluating of Drought Stress Tolerance based on selection indices in spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(11), 78-85.
  22. Lea-Cox, J. & Syvertsen, J. P. (1993). Salinity reduces water use and nitrate- N-use- efficiency of citrus. Annals of Botany, 72, 47-54.
  23. Matsumoto, K., Chun, J., Tamura, F., Kamamoto, Y. J. P. & Tanabe, K. (2006). Salt tolerance in Pyrus species is linked to levels of Na and Cl translocation from roots to leaves. Journal- Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 75(5), 385-391.
  24. Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environment, 25, 239-250.
  25. Naeini, M.R., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H. & Fallahi, E. (2006). Partitioning of chlorine, sodium and potassium and shoot growth of three pomegranate cultivars under different levels of salinity. Journal of Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29, 1835-1843.
  26. Okubo, M., Furukawa, Y. & Sakuratani, T. (2000). Growth, flowering and leaf properties of pear cultivars grafted on two Asian pear rootstock seedlings under NaCl irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae, 91-101.
  27. Oxborough, K. (2004). Using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to monitor photosynthetic performance. 254-298.In: Papa Georgiou, G. and E. D. S. Govindjee. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. Paknejad, F., Majidiheravan, E., Noormohammadi, Q., Siyadat, A. & Vazan, S. (2007). Effects of drought strees on chlorophyll fluorence parameters, chlorophyll content and grain yield of wheat cultivars. American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 5(4), 162-169.
  29. Radnia, H. (1996). Fruit Trees. (Translation). First Edition, Educational Agricultural Publishing. 637 pages.
  30. Rosielle, A. A. & Hamblin, J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science, 21, 943 -946.
  31. Shani, U. & Ben-Gal, A. (2005). Long-term response of grape vines to salinity: osmotic effects and ion toxicity. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 30(56), 2.
  32. Sotiropoulos, T. E., Therios, I. N., Almaliotis, D., Papadakis, I. & Dimassi, K. N. (2006). Response of cherry rootstocks to boron and salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29, 1691-1698.
  33. Szczerba, M. W., Britto, D. T. & Kronzucker, H. J. (2009). K+ transport in plants: physiology and molecular biology. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166, 447-466.
  34. Tabatabaei, S. J. (2006). Effects of salinity and N on the growth, photosynthesis and N status of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees. Scientia Horticulturae, 108, 432-488.
  35. Wilson, J. M. & Greave, J. A. (1993). Development of water stress in crop plants. In: Adaption of food crops to temperature and water stress, AVRDC, Taiwan, pp: 389-398.
  36. Zhao, G. Q., Ma, B. L. & Ren, C. Z. (2007). Growth, Gas Exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity. Journal of Crop Science, 41, 123-131.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 شهریور 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 29 فروردین 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 25 اردیبهشت 1395

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار