بررسی روابط بین صفات ریخت‌شناختی میوه و کیفیت آن در رگه‌های گوجه‌فرنگی از طریق ضریب‌های همبستگی و تجزیة علیت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی سابق دکتری، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت

2 استاد، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت

3 دانشیار، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت

4 استادیار، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد رشت، رشت

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی روابط بین صفات مؤثر بر وزن میوه در گوجه­فرنگی، همبستگی­های فنوتیپی و ژنوتیپی صفات کمیتی و ریخت‌شناختی (مورفولوژیکی) و کیفیت میوه با استفاده از یازده رگه (لاین)، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. نتایج تجزیة واریانس نشان داد اختلاف بین رگه­ها برای همة صفات معنی­دار بود. نتایج تجزیة همبستگی فنوتیپی و ژنوتیپی نشان داد صفت وزن میوه همبستگی معنی­داری با اغلب صفات داشت. بیشترین مقادیر همبستگی مثبت فنوتیپی و ژنوتیپی بین صفت وزن و قطر میوه به دست آمد. نتایج تجزیة رگرسیون نشان داد صفات قطر میوه و نسبت طول به قطر میوه بیشترین تأثیر را بر وزن میوه در رگه­های مختلف گوجه­فرنگی داشتند. تجزیة علیت ژنوتیپی نشان داد که طول میوه، شمار برچه و فنول کل به ترتیب بیشترین تأثیر مستقیم و مثبت را روی وزن میوه داشتند و طول میوه به­طور غیرمستقیم با درصد مواد جامد کل، قطر میوه، شمار برچه و ضخامت فرابر (پریکارپ) بر وزن میوه تأثیر داشت. تجزیة علیت فنوتیپی نشان داد که به ترتیب صفات ضخامت فرابر میوه، فنول کل و قطر میوه بیشترین تأثیر مستقیم را روی وزن میوه داشتند و ضخامت فرابر میوه به­طور غیرمستقیم با طول میوه، قطر میوه و شمار برچه بر وزن میوه تأثیر داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the relationship between fruit morphologic characteristics and quality in tomato lines via correlation coefficients and path analysis

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamileh Rahaii 1
  • Moazam Hassanpour Asil 2
  • Habibollah Samizadeh Lahiji 3
  • Rasoul Onsinejad 4
1 University of Guilan
3 University of Guilan
4 Rasht Islamic Azad University
چکیده [English]

To investigate the genotypic and phenotypic relationship between characteristics affecting tomato fruit weights, eleven tomato lines were compared in a RCB design with three replications. The ANOVA showed that the difference among lines was significant for all characteristics. There was a significant phenotypic and genotypic correlations between fruit weight and most of the characteristics. The highest amount of phenotypic and genotypic correlations were obtained between fruit diameter and weight. The regression analysis showed the highest effect on the fruit weight was due to the fruit diameter and the fruit length/diameter ratio which controls 92% of its variation. The path analysis on genotypic correlation revealed the fruit length which, number of locules and total phenol had the greatest direct effects on the fruit weight and fruit length which had indirect effect on fruit weight via percentage of total soluble solids, fruit diameter, number of locules, total acidity, fruit length and diameter, number of locules and fruit pericarp thickness. The path analysis of phenotypic correlation showed that the fruit pericarp thickness, total phenol, fruit diameter had the greatest direct effects and fruit pericarp thickness had indirect effect on fruit weight via fruit length and diameter and number of locules, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • antioxidant capacity
  • beta-carotene
  • lycopene
  • Regression

مراجع

  1. Anikumar, V.R., Thakur, M.C. & Hedau, N.K. (2003). Correlation and path coefficient analysis in tomato. Annals of Agricultural Research New Series, 24, 175-177.
  2. Annonyms. (2008). Monthly Livestock, Agro-industry. 115. (in Farsi)
  3. Ara, A.R., Narayan, N. & Khan, S.H. (2009). Genetic variability and selection parameters for yield and quality attributes in tomato. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 66, 73-78.
  4. Boor, J.Y., Chen, H.Y. & Yen, G.C. (2006). Evaluation of antioxidant activity and inhibitory effect on nitric oxide production of some common vegetables. Agricultural Food Chemistery, 54, 1680-1686.
  5. Chaudhary, R.C. & Khanna, K.R. (1972). Inheritance of locule number in a cross in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 42, 781-789.
  6. Dewy, D.R. & Lu, K.H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51, 515-518.
  7. Farshadfar, A. (1996). Application of biometrical genetics. Vol 1. Taghe Bostan. (in Farsi)
  8. Ghasemnezhad, M., Sherafati, M. & Peyvast, G.A. (2012). Variation in phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid and antioxidant activity of five coloured bell pepper (Capsicum annum) fruits at two different harvest times. Journal of Functional Foods, 3, 44-49.
  9. Giovannucci, E. (1999). Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of epidemiologic literature. Natural Cancer Institute, 91, 317-331.
  10. Hydayatullah, A., Jatoi, S.A., Ghafoor, A. & Tariqh, M. (2008). Path coefficient analysis of yield component in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Pakistan Journal of Botany,40(2), 627-635.
  11. Kallo, G. & Bepgh, B.O. (1985). Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops. Avi publishing Company, p. 135-169.
  12. Mahapatra, A.S., Singh, K.A., ManjuVani, V., Mishra, R., Kumar & Rajkumar, B.V. (2013). Inter-relationship for various components and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). International Journal of Current Microbiology Applied Science, 2(9), 147-152.
  13. McGiffen, M.E., Pantone, D.J. & Masiunas, J.B. (1994). Path analysis of tomato yield components in relation to competition with black and eastern black nightshade. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science, 119, 6-11.
  14. Mehta, N. & Asati, B.S. (2008). Genetic relationship of growth and development traits with yield in to tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(1), 92-96.
  15. Mittal, P., Sant Prakash & Singh, A.K. (1996). Variability studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) under sub humid conditions of Himachal Pradesh. South Indian Journal, 44,132-134.
  16. Monamodi, E.L., Lungu, D.M. & Fite, G.L. (2013). Analysis of fruit yield and its components in determinate tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using correlation and path coefficient. Journal of Agricultural Applied Sciences, 9 (1), 29-40.
  17. Nagata, M. & Yamashita, I. (1992). Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Journal of Japanese Society of Food Science and Technology, 39, 925-928.
  18. Peyvast, Gh. & Barzagar, R. (2005). Growing greenhouse seedless cucumber and greenhouse tomatoes in soil and in soiless media, Danesh Pazir Press. (in Farsi)
  19. Prashanth, S.J., R.P. Jaiprakashnarayan, Ravindra, M. & Madalageri, M.B. (2008). Correlation and path analysis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Asian Journal of Horticultural, 3(2), 403-408.
  20. Pujari, C.V., Wagh, R.S. & Kale, P.N. (1995). Genetic variability and heritability in tomato. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural University, 20, 15-17.
  21. Rahaii, J. (2009). Evaluation of genetic parameters of morphologic characteristics for Lycopersicon esculentum using generation mean analysis. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of agricultural, University of Guilan. (in Farsi)
  22. Rani, I., Veeraragavathatham D. & Sanjutha, D. (2008). Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis on yield attributes in root knot nematodes resistant F1 hybrids of tomato. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 4, 287-295.
  23. Reddy, M.L.N. & Gulshanlal, G. (1987) Genetic variability and path coefficient analysis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under summer season. Progressive Horticulture, 19, 284-288.
  24. Rodriguez, G.R., Pratta M. & Zorzoli, R. (2006). Evaluation of plant and fruit traits in recombinant inbred lines of tomato obtained from a cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium. Ciencia e Investigation Agraria, 33(2), 111-118.
  25. Singh, A.K., Sharma, J.P., Kumar, S. & Chopra, S. (2008). Genetic divergence in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of SKUASTJ, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, 7(1), 105-110.
  26. Singh, A.K. (2005). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under cold arid region of Ladakh. Progrressive Horticulture, 37(2), 437- 443.
  27. Singh, A.K. (2007). Correlation and path coefficient studies in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under cold arid region of Ladakh. Journal of Horticulture, 36(3and4), 346-447.
  28. Singh, A.K., Sharma, J.P. & Kumar, S. (2007). Variability, correlation and path studies on harvest index and yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The Horticultural Journal, 20(1), 25-29.
  29. Singh, J.P., Singh, D.K. & Gulshanlal, G. (2002). Variability pattern in agro-morphological characters in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Progressive Horticulture, 32, 79-81.
  30. Stommel, J.R. & Haynes, K.G. (1994). Inheritance of beta-carotene content in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon cheesmani. Journal of Heredity, 85(5), 401-404.
  31. Upadhyay, M., Singh, J.P., Singh, A. & Joshi, A. (2005). Studies on genetic variability in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Progressive Horticulture, 37, 463-465.
  32. Valizadeh, M. & Moghadam M. (2010). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Iran University Press.
  33. Vikram A. & Kohli, U.K. (1998). Genectic variability, correlation and path analysis in tomato. Journal of Hill Research, 11, 107-111.

  34. Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 20, 557-587.

 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 تیر 1393
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 10 آذر 1393
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 06 دی 1393

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار