علوم باغبانی ایران

علوم باغبانی ایران

ارزیابی ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی لاین‌های‌دابل‌هاپلویید خیار و قدرت هیبریدهای حاصل‌از آ‌ن‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم و مهندسی باغبانی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
2 بخش تحقیقات کشت بافت و سلول، پژوهشگاه بیوتکنولوژی کشاورزی (ABRII)، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی (AREEO)، کرج، ایران.
چکیده
معمولاً برای ایجاد لاین‌های خالص از روش‌های پر‌هزینه و زمان‌‌بر نظیر خودگشنی استفاده می‌شود. ایجاد فن‌آوری‌های کارآمد جدید نظیر هاپلویید‌های مضاعف‌شده و اصلاح معکوس می‌تواند یک راه‌حل مؤثر و سریع برای تهیه لاین‌های خالص باشد. در این تحقیق، از لاین‌های دابل‌هاپلوییدی استفاده گردید که با به‌کارگیری روش القای جنین‌های پارتنوژنز پس‌از گرده‌افشانی با گرده‌های پرتوتابی‌شده تولید شده بودند. آزمون تاپ‌کراس بااستفاده‌از 15 لاین دابل‌هاپلویید تولیدی و والد تاپ‌کراس بیت‌آلفا جهت بررسی ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی لاین‌ها انجام شد. هیبرید‌های حاصل‌از تلاقی لاین در تستر بیت‌آلفا در گل‌خانه کشت شدند. به‌منظور ارزیابی قدرت ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی لاین‌ها صفات روز تا گل‌دهی، تعداد میوه، وزن میوه، میانگین عملکرد تک‌بوته، قطر مغز میوه، قطر میوه، طول میوه و طول بیست گره ساقه اصلی اندازه‌گیری و تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. مقایسه میانگین‌ها توسط آزمون توکی نشان داد نتایج حاصل‌از تلاقی لاین‌های دابل‌هاپلویید DH34، DH102، DH4، DH36 و DH5 با والد مشترک بیت‌آلفا به‌ترتیب با میانگین 3/854، 7/742، 7/617، 7/545 و 3/519 گرم در بوته، بالاترین میزان عملکرد میوه را داشتند. در این میان، بالاترین مقدار مربوط به نتاج حاصل‌از تلاقی Beit Alpha × DH34 با میانگین 3/854 گرم در بوته و Beit Alpha × DH102 با میانگین 7/742 گرم در بوته بود. وراثت‌پذیری برخی از صفات موردارزیابی بیش‌از هشتاد درصد بود که در این میان، صفات روز تا گل‌دهی، وزن میوه و طول میوه بیشترین مقدار را به خود اختصاص دادند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the General Combining Ability of Doubled Haploid Cucumber Lines and the Heterosis of Their Hybrids

نویسندگان English

hooman Sharifi 1
Jamalali Olfati 1
Mehran Enayati Shariatpanahi 2
1 Department of Horticultural Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Department of Tissue and Cell Culture, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

To create inbred lines, expensive and time-consuming methods such as self-pollination are typically used. However, new efficient technologies like doubled haploids and inverse breeding offer effective and faster solutions for producing inbred lines. In this research, doubled haploid lines produced through parthenogenesis embryo induction following pollination with irradiated pollen were utilized. A top-cross test was conducted using 15 doubled haploid lines and the top-cross parent, Beit Alpha, to examine the general combining ability of the lines. Hybrids derived from line × tester (Beit Alpha) crosses were planted in the greenhouse. To evaluate the general combining ability of the lines, several traits were measured and analyzed, including days to flowering, fruit number, fruit weight, average yield per plant, placental diameter, fruit diameter, fruit length, and the length of 20 nodes of the main stem. Comparison of means using the Tukey test revealed that the doubled haploid lines DH34, DH102, DH4, DH36, and DH5, crossed with the common parent Beit Alpha, had the highest fruit yields, with averages of 854.3, 742.7, 617.7, 545.7, and 519.3 grams per plant, respectively. Among these, the top-cross progeny from DH34 × Beit Alpha and DH102 × Beit Alpha had the highest yields, averaging 854.3 and 742.7 grams per plant, respectively. The heritability of some evaluated traits was over 80%, with the number of days to flowering, fruit weight, and fruit length showing the highest heritability.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Tester
Yield
Heterosis
Genetic variance
Heritability

Extended Abstract

Introduction

    Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is a highly significant vegetable within the Cucurbitaceae family, cultivated globally. Iran ranks as the fourth-largest cucumber producer worldwide, with a cultivated area of 40,344 hectares yielding 1,205,679 tons. This places Iran behind Turkey, Russia, and China in production volume. Notably, Iran imports over $120 million worth of vegetable and summer crops annually. This figure represents only legal imports and excludes smuggled goods, with approximately 98% of the country’s vegetable and summer crop needs being imported. The production of F1 hybrid seeds presents the most efficient and appealing technology for seed production institutions, owing to substantial yield increases, premium pricing, and the potential to maintain breeder rights.

 

Materials and Methods

Doubled haploid lines of cucumber were developed by applying parthenogenesis embryo induction following pollination with irradiated pollen from the commercial hybrids Negeen, Isfahan, Datis, Emparator, and Hi Power. This process was conducted at the Department of Tissue and Cell Culture of the Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII). These doubled haploid lines, along with open-pollinated seeds of Beit Alpha, were cultivated. Upon reaching the flowering stage, the doubled haploid lines were crossed with Beit Alpha, serving as the common tester. The resulting seeds from these crosses were planted in a greenhouse for evaluation.

To assess and identify the best line × tester combinations, key traits were recorded from the plant’s early growth stages. These included days to flowering, fruit weight, placental diameter, single plant yield, fruit number, and other morphological characteristics such as fruit length, fruit diameter, and the length of 20 main stem nodes. The research was carried out in the greenhouse of ABRII using a completely randomized design with three replications. Statistical analysis, including analysis of variance and mean comparisons, was performed using Tukey’s test at a 5% probability level via SAS software. In this study, doubled haploid (DH) lines exhibiting high, low, or intermediate general combining ability for the desired traits were crossed with each other to examine the outcomes.

 

Results and Discussion

Out of the 15 selected lines, 12 proved capable of germination and crossbreeding. Variance analysis of the studied traits revealed significant differences among the progeny resulting from the crossing of the selected lines with the Beit Alpha tester across all traits. Mean comparisons using Tukey’s test indicated that the doubled haploid lines DH34, DH102, DH4, DH36, and DH5, when crossed with the common parent Beit Alpha, yielded the highest fruit production, with averages of 854.3, 742.7, 617.7, 545.7, and 519.3 grams per plant, respectively. The top-performing top-cross progeny were DH34 × Beit Alpha and DH102 × Beit Alpha, yielding approximately 854.3 and 742.7 grams per plant, respectively.

The heritability for some evaluated traits exceeded 80%, with days to flowering, fruit weight, and fruit length demonstrating the highest heritability. The heritability rate for fruit number was 53%, and for single plant yield, it was 57%. High broad-sense heritability values are associated with general combining ability, which was most pronounced in the DH34 and DH102 lines within this research.

Interestingly, crossing lines with high general combining ability, such as DH34 and DH102, did not result in hybrids exhibiting significant heterosis compared to the average of the parents for cucumber plant performance traits. Similarly, crosses involving lines with low or negative general combining ability, like DH25 and DH1, did not yield hybrids with high heterosis for those traits. Furthermore, progeny from crosses between lines with high general combining ability and those with negative or low general combining ability, such as DH102 and DH25, did not display substantial heterosis for cucumber plant yield traits relative to the average of the parents. It is important to note that since genetic variance incorporates a component of dominance variance, high general combining ability values do not automatically guarantee superior combinations through progeny selection. Additionally, the quality of progeny resulting from hybridization between such lines cannot be definitively predicted.

 

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to the development of this manuscript from the initial draft to the final submitted version, including all subsequent revisions. 

 

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

 

 

Acknowledgements 

This research was supported by grants from Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII) Project No.34-05-0533-014-020240.

 

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

 

Conflict of interest 

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

منابع

الفتی‌ چیرانی، جمالعلی؛ پیوست، غلامعلی؛ سمیع‌ زاده لاهیجی، حبیب‌ الله؛ ربیعی، بابک؛ خداپرست، سید اکبر. (1390). برآورد ترکیب پذیری عمومی، خصوصی و هتروزیس تعدادی از لاین‌های خیار برای عملکرد از طریق تلاقی دای آلل ناقص. مجله علوم باغبانی ایران، 42(1): 64-53.
زارع بیاتی، اعظم؛ مصطفوی، خداداد؛ عنایتی شریعت پناهی، مهران؛ میری، سید مهدی. (1400). تولید و ارزیابی قدرت ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی لاین‌های دابل‌هاپلویید فلفل‌دلمه‌ای (Capsicum annum L.). مجله علوم باغبانی ایران، 52(4): 965-976. https://10.22059/ijhs.2021.320691.1908
ستمدیده مسلمی، فاطمه؛ الفتی، جمالعلی؛ حمید‌اوغلی، یوسف. (1398). ارزیابی نتایج حاصل‌از تلاقی لاین‌های منتخب خیار با هیبرید تجاری نگین. مجله علوم باغبانی ایران، 50(3): 539-548. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.231888.1236
عنایتی شریعت‌پناهی، مهران؛ شکیب، علی محمد؛ امامی میبدی، داوود. (1390). هاپلوییدی و کاربردهای آن در ژنتیک و اصلاح نباتات. کرج: انتشارات پژوهشکده بیوتکنولوژی کشاورزی ایران. 276.
کلوندی، حمید؛ الفتی، جمالعلی؛ سمیع ‌زاده لاهیجی، حبیب‌ الله؛ وفایی، یاور. (1395). بر‌آورد وراثت‌پذیری و پاسخ به انتخاب برای صفات تعداد میوه در جمعبت اصلاحی خیار. دو فصلنامه علوم سبزی‌ها، 2(4): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2016.32794
مرادی‌پور، فاطمه؛ الفتی، جمالعلی؛ حمید‌اوغلی، یوسف؛ صبوری، عاطفه. (1396). بررسی ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی، خصوصی و هتروزیس صفات رویشی تعدادی از لاین‌های خیار. نشریه علوم باغبانی، 31(1): 131-139. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.47343
 
 
REFERENCES
Adday, H. A. (2017). Estimation of heterosis, combining ability and some genetic parameters in sweet pepper. Journal of Plant Production, 8(5): 629-633.
Airina, C. K.; Pradeepkumar, T. & Krishnan, S. (2017). Combining ability studies exploiting gynoecy in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 8(2): 724-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370220953065 
Al-Araby, A.A.; Ahmed, M.E.; Omran, S.A. & Aboshanady, A.M. (2019). Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) using line × tester analysis. Egyptian Journal of plant breeding, 23(6):1169– 1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/16857195.2019.1647089
Ana, I.; Lopez-Sese, S.; Jack, S. & Staub, J. (2002). Combining ability analysis of yield components in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of American Society for Horticultural Sciences, 127(6): 931-937.
Ashraf, M., & Ahmad, S. (2000). Genetic effects for yield components and fiber characteristics in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivated under salinized (NaCl) conditions. Agronomie. 20(8): 917- 926.
Devi, M. B.; Pathania, N. & Thakur, N. (2018). Estimation of genetic variability, GCA and SCA effects for development of early and high yielding bell pepper hybrids suitable for protected cultivation. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 10(1): 410-416.
Dey, S. S.; Sagar, V.; Kujur, S. N.; Pradeep, K. N.; Munshi, A. D.; Pandey, S. & Behera, T. K. (2023). Cucumber: Breeding and Genomics. Vegetable Science, 50: 208-220.
Dong, Y. Q.;  Zhao, W. X.; Li, X. H.; Liu,  Xi. C.; Gao, N. N.; Huang, J. H.; Wang, W. Y.;  Xu, X. L. & Tang, Z. H. (2016). Androgenesis, gynogenesis and parthenogenesis haploids in cucurbit species. Plant Cell Reports, 35(10): 1991-2019.
Enayati Shariatpanahi, M.; Shakib, A. M. & Emami Meibodi, D. (2012). Haploidy and its applications in Genetics and Plant breeding. Agricuture Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran Publications. Karaj. 276. [In Persian]
Ene, C. O.; Ogbonna, P. E.; Agbo, C. U. & Chukwudi, U. P. (2019). Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Information processing in agriculture, 6(1): 150-157.
Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Scientific & Technical, London.
FAO)2022(. FAOSTAT agricultural database. Available at: http://apps.fao.org
Faris, N. M. & Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. (1999). Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) embryo development in situ after pollination with irradiated pollen. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica, 41(1): 111–118.
Hanchnamani, C. N. & Pati, M. G. (2009). Heterosis in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Asian Journal of Horticulture, 4(1): 21-24.
Gaikwad, A. G.; Musmade, A. M.; Dhumal, S. S. & Sonawane, H. G. (2011). Variability studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Ecology Environment and Conservation, 17(4): 799-802.
Ghahal, G. S. & Gosal, S. S. (2002). Principles and procedures of plant breeding. Alpha Science International. Oxford, 604.
Golabadi, M.; Golkar, P. & Eghtedary, A. (2015). Combining ability analysis of fruit yield and morphological traits in greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95(2): 377-385.
Gozen, V.; Kestin, L. & Eren, A. (2020). Study on Combining ability and heterotic pattern in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Horticulturae, 1282: 213-220. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1282.33 
Kalvandi, H.; Olfati, J.A.; Samizadeh Lahiji, H. & Vafaee, Y. (2016). Number of fruit heritability and response to selection in breeding population of cucumber. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 2(4): 20-13. [In Persian]
Knopf, R. R. & Trebitsh, T. (2006). The Female-Specific Cs-ACS1G gene of cucumber. A case of gene duplicationand recombination between the non-sex-specific 1-ami-nocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene and abranched-chain amino acid transaminase gene. Plant Cell Physiology, 47(9): 1217–1228.
Kumar, S.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, R.; Thakur, K. S. & Singh Dogra, B. (2013). Estimation of Genetic Variability and Divergence for Fruit Yield and Quality Traits in Cucumber (Cucumis Sativus L.) in North-Western Himalays. Universal Journal of Plant Science, 1(2): 27-36.
Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, D.; Gautam, N.; Singh, N.; Parkash, C. & Shukla, Y. R. (2017). Heterotic potential, potence ratio, combining ability and genetic control of yield and its contributing traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 45(3): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2016.1270336
Lopez-Sese, A. I. & Staub, J. (2002). Combining Ability Analysis of Yield Components in Cucumber. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127(6): 931-937. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.6.931  
Moradipour , F.; Olfati , J. A.; Hamidoghli,  Y.; Saburi, A. & Zahedi, B. (2017). Assessment of General and Specific Combining Ability and Heterosis of some Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Fresh Type Lines through Half Diallel Analyses. Plant Production Technology, 31(1): 131-139. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.47343 [In Persian]
Mule, P. N.; Khandelwal, V.; Lodam, V. A.; Shinde, D. A.; Patil, P. P. & Patil, A. B. (2012). Heterosis and combining ability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Madras Agricultural Journal, 99(7-9): 420-423.
Nduwumuremyi, A.; Tongoona, P. & Habimana, S. (2013). Mating designs: helpful tool for quantitative plant breeding analysis. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 1(3): 117-129.
Olfati Chirani, J. A.; Peyvast, GH.; Samizadeh Lahiji, H.; Rabie, B. & Khodaparast, S. A. (2011). General and specific combining ability and heterosis estimation of some cucumber lines for qualitative traits in partial diallel design. Journal of Horticultural Science, 42 (1), 53-64. [In Persian]
Pierce, L. K. & Wehner, T. C. (1990). Review of Genes and Linkage Groups in Cucumber. HortScience, 25(6): 605-606.
Rohini, N.; Lakshmanan, V.; Saraladevi, D.; Amalraj, J. J. & Govindaraju, P. (2017). Assessment of combining ability for yield and quality components in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research, 15(2): 1-12.
Setamdideh Moslemi, F.; Olfati, J. A. & Hamidoghli, Y. (2019). The evaluation of cross progeny between Elite lines and commercial hybrid ‘Negeen. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 50(3): 539-548. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijhs.2018.231888.1236 [In Persian]
Setyaningastuti, H. F.; Taryono, T. & Sayekti, R. S. (2019). The Estimation of Genetic Parameters of Cucumber Fruit Yield components (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Agriculture Innovation, 2(1): 001-006.
Shen, J.; Dirks, R. & Havey, M. J. (2015). Diallel Crossing Among Doubled Haploids of Cucumber Reveals Significant Reciprocal-cross Differences. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 140(2):178–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jash.1237
Shukla, I. N.; Shunder, S.; Singh, D. K.; Singh, N.; Pandey, R. & Awasti, P. N. (2010). Genetic variability and selection parameters for fruit yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences, 2(2): 107-108.
Tatlioglu, T. )1993(. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L). In Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops. edited by Kalloo, G., & Bergh, B. O. Oxford: Pergamon Press: 197-227.
Veena, R.; Sidhu, A. S.; Pitchaimuthu, M. & Souravi, K. (2012). Genetic evaluation of some cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for some yield and related traits. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 3(3): 945-948.
Wehner, T.C. (1989). Breeding for improved yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Breeding Reviews, 6: 323-359.
Yadav, Y. C.; Kumar, S. & Singh, R. (2012). Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). HortFlora Research Spectrum, 1(1): 34-37.
Zarebayati, A.; Mostafavi, KH.; Enayati Shariatpanahi, M. & Miri, S. M. (2022). Production and evaluation of general combining ability of doubled haploid lines in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 52(4),: 965-976. https://10.22059/ijhs.2021.320691.1908 [In Persian]
دوره 56، شماره 3
پاییز 1404
صفحه 539-555

  • تاریخ دریافت 20 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 بهمن 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 29 بهمن 1403