Investigation of the effect of culture system, cultivar and different nutrient solutions on some growth and physiological parameters of potato plant

Document Type : Full Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

2 Former M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

Aeroponic is a new technology for potato minituber production. In order to recognition of the suitable nutrient solution and potato variety for minituber production in aeroponics in comparison with classic hydroponics, a factorial experiment was carried out with three factors of culture systems (aeroponics and hydroponics), nutrient solutions (Chang et al., 2008; APCoAB and commercial nutrient solution of Esfahan), and three cultivars of potato (Marfana, Santana and Morn). Leaf number, leaf area, stolon length, shoot and roots dry mass, photosynthetical pigments content, photochemical quantum yield of PS II photochemistry (Fv/Fm), photosynthetical performance index (PI) were investigated. Results showed that plants growing in aeroponics exhibited a considerable increase in growth and physiological parameters regardless of cultivar and nutrient solution, compared to classic hydroponic system. It might be due to the better nutrient availability and aeration of roots in this system. Also, root and shoot dry mass of plants and photosynthetic pigment contents were higher in aeroponic than classic hydroponic grown plants. In addition, plants nourished with Esfahan economical nutrient solution had higher vegetative growth compared to Chang et al. (2008) and APCoAB nutrient solution, which was due to the higher N in this solution.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous. (2008). International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, Website at http//www.cipotato.org/potato/potato.htm.
  2. Arnon, D. I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24, 1-15.
  3. Chang, D. C., Park, C. S. & Kim, S. Y. (2008). Physiological growth responses by nutrient in aeroponically grown potatoes. American Journal of Potato Research, 85, 315-323.
  4. Cho, Y. D., Kang, S. G., Kim, Y. D., Shin, G. H. & Kim, K. T. (1996). Effects of culture systems on growth and yield of cherry tomatoes in hydroponics. Journal of Agricultural Science, 38, 563-567.
  5. Christie, C. B. & Nichols, M. A. (2004). Aeroponics a production system and research tool. Acta Horticulturae, 648, 185-190.
  6. Correa, R. M., Pinto, J. E. B. P., Pinto, C. A. B. P., Faquin, V., Reis, E. S., Monteiro, A. B. & Dyer, W. E. (2008). A comparison of potato seed tuber yields in beds, pots and hydroponic systems Horticultural Science, 116, 17-20.
  7. Fascella, G. & Zizzo, G.V. (2007). Preliminary results of aeroponic cultivation of Anthurium andreanum for cut flower production. Acta Horticulturae, 747, 233-240.
  8. Hayden, A. L., Brigham, L. A. & Giacomelli, G. A. (2004). Aeroponic cultivation of ginger (Zingiber officinalis) rhizomes. Acta Horticulturae, 659, 397-402.
  9. He, J. & Lee, S. K. (1998). Growth and photosynthetic responses of three aeroponically grown lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa L.) to different rootzone temperatures and growth irradiances under tropical aerial conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, 152, 387-391.
  10. Hermans, C., Johnson, G. N., Strasser, R. J. & Verbruggen, N. (2004). Physiological characterisation of magnesium deficiency in sugar beet: acclimation to low magnesium differentially affects photosystems I and II. Planta, 220(2), 344-355.
  11. Ian, J., Bingham, A., Glyn Bingoush, A. & Robert, M. (2010). Soil compaction-n interaction in barley: Root growth and tissue composition, Soil and Tillage Research, 106, 241- 246.
  12. Kaftan, D., Brumfeld, V., Nevo, R., Scherz, A. & Reich, Z. (2002). From chloroplasts to photosystems: in situ scanning force microscopy on intact thylakoid membranes. Journal of Experimental botany, 21, 6246-6253.
  13. Kang, J.G., Yang, S.Y. & Kim, S.Y. (1996). Effects of nitrogen levels on the plant growth, tuberization and quality of potatoes grown in aeroponics. Journal of the Korean Socirty for HortScience, 37, 761-766.
  14. Khalilian, A., Hood, C. E., Palmer, J. H., Garner, T. H. & Bathke, G. R. (1991). Soil compaction and crop response to wheat/soybean inter seeding, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 34(6), 2299-2303.
  15. Molitor, H. D., Fischer, M. & Popadopoulos, A. P. (1999). Effect of several parameters on the growth of chrysanthemum stock plants in aeroponics. Volume I. Acta Horticulturae, 481, 179-187.
  16. Movahhedi, Z. (2011). Investigation of the effect of environmental factors on minituber induction of potato in aeroponic system. Ph.D. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. (in Persian)
  17. Nenova, V. (2006). Efect of iron supply on growth and photosystem II efficiency of pea plants. General and Applied Plant Physiology, Special Issue, 81-90.
  18. Otazu, V. (2010). Manual on quality seed potato production using aeroponics. International potato Centre (CIP). Lima, Peru. 44 pp.
  19. Park, H. S. & Chiang, M. H. (1997). Effects of form and concentration of nitrogen in aeroponic solution on growth, chlorophyll, nitrogen contents and enzyme activities in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science, 38(60), 642-646.
  20. Pestana, M., Vaennes, A. and Araújo Faria, E. (2003). Diagnosis and correction of iron chlorosis in fruit trees: a review. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 1(1), 46-51.
  21. Ranalli, P., Bassi, F., Ruaro, G., Del Re, P., Di Candilo, M. & Mandolino, G. (1994). Microtuber and mini-tuber production and field performance compared with normal tubers. Potato Research, 37, 383-391.
  22. Rizza, F., Pagani, D., Stanca, A. M. & Cattivelli, L. (2001). Use of chlorophyll fluorescence to evaluate the cold acclimation and freezing tolerance of winter and spring oats. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 120, 389- 396.
  23. Rolot, J., Seutin, H. & Michelant, D. (2002). Production de minituber cules depomme de terre par hydroponie. Biotechnology Agronomy Society and Environment, 6(3), 155-161.
  24. Shangguan, Z., Shao, M. & Dyckmans, J. (2000). Effects of nitrogen nutrition and water deficit on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in winter whet. Journal of plant physiology, 156, 45-51.
  25. Soffer, H. & Burger, D. W. (1988). Effects of dissolved oxygen concentration in aero-hydroponics on the formation and growth of adventitious roots. Amerrican Journal of potato Research, 113, 218-221.
  26. Strasser, R. J., Srivastava, A. & Tsimilli-Michael, M. (2000). The fluorescence transient as a too to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. Photosynthesis Research, 94, 445-483.
  27. Struik, P. C. & wiersema, S. G. (1999). Seed potato technology. Wagemingen Pers, Wagemingen, Plant Cell, Tissus and Organ Culture, 65, 173-174.
  28. Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. (2006). Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates, (3rd ed).
  29. Tukaki, L. & Mahler, R. L. (1989). Evaluation of potting mix composition on potato plantlet tuber production under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 12, 1055-1068.
  30. Wan, W. Y., Cao, W. & Tibbitts, T. W. (1994). Tuber initiation in hydroponically grown potatoes by alteration of solution pH. Horticultural Science, 29, 621-623.
  31. Weathers, P. J. & Zobel, R. W. (1992). Aeroponics for the culture of organisms, tissues and cells. Biotechnology Advances, 10(1), 93-115.
Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science
Volume 46, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
January 2016
Pages 613-622

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 27 April 2014
  • Revise Date: 24 August 2014
  • Accept Date: 13 September 2014

Share

How to cite

Statistics