Hybridization between diploid and tetraploid parents in sour citrus breeding

Document Type : Full Paper

Authors

1 Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University,Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Molecular Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of North Region, Rasht,, Iran

3 Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Department of Molecular Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of North Region,,, Rasht, Iran

5 Department of Genetics and Breeding, Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Center, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ramsar, Iran

6 Department of Post-harvest Physiology and Technology, Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Center, Iranian Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ramsar, Iran.

Abstract

This study aimed to develop triploid acid citrus genotypes. To this end, we evaluated the ploidy stability of two key lime genotypes (A and B) and three sweet lime genotypes (C, D, and E). The results showed that in tree A, four of the five main branches (A1–A4) were diploid (2n = 2x), whereas one branch (A5) was mixoploid (2x + 4x). In contrast, all seven main branches of tree B were uniformly triploid (2n = 3x). Among the sweet lime genotypes, trees C and D were tetraploid, while tree E was diploid.  Controlled crosses were then carried out between clementine mandarin and the triploid key lime (tree B), as well as between three lemon female parents (‘Eureka’, ‘Cook Eureka’, and ‘Lisbon’) and two tetraploid sweet lime genotypes (trees C and D). Crosses between clementine mandarin and the Mexican lime (tree B) produced neither fruit nor seeds. In contrast, crosses involving the three lemon cultivars and the tetraploid sweet limes successfully produced both fruit and seeds.  The resulting seeds, which were small in size and highly monoembryonic, were cultured on B5 medium. Flow cytometric analysis of fifteen interploid hybrids identified ten diploid seedlings of nucellar origin and five triploid seedlings (2n = 3x). Of the triploid seedlings, four were derived from the ‘Eureka’ × sweet lime cross and one from the ‘Cook Eureka’ × sweet lime cross. These triploid seedlings represent a novel outcome. They are expected to be seedless and should be further evaluated for their phenotypic traits.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Extended Abstract

Introduction

              Acid limes and lemons belong to a group of citruses known as acid citrus. Fruits of this group are highly juicy, acidic, rich in vitamin C, and usually seeded. One of the most important goals in citrus breeding is to develop cultivars that produce seedless fruits. Like other citrus fruits, seedless lime and lemon cultivars are highly valuable in both the fresh fruit market and the processing industry. In citrus, fruits of diploid and tetraploid genotypes are generally seeded, whereas only triploid genotypes are seedless. To obtain triploids, tetraploid cultivars must first be produced, and then triploid cultivars can be generated through crosses between diploid and tetraploid plants, or vice versa. The aim of this research was to obtain triploid acid citrus genotypes through controlled crossings between diploid and tetraploid citrus cultivars.

 

Materials and Methods                                                                                                                                               

In the Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Northern Iran (Rasht), polyploid genotypes of ‘Mexican’ or key lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) and sweet lime (Citrus limettioides Tan.) were previously developed by colchicine treatments and were well preserved. In the present study, these genotypes were used to produce triploid plants.  In the first step, the polyploidy level stability of two key lime genotypes (A and B) and three sweet lime genotypes (C, D, and E) was evaluated using flow cytometry. Additionally, several vegetative and reproductive traits of trees A and B were assessed, including leaf characteristics (blade length, width, and diameter, petiole length, and stomatal density) and fruit traits (fruit weight, length, and width, total soluble solids, total acidity, peel thickness, seed number, juice content, and seed polyembryony).  In the second stage of the study, controlled crosses were performed at the citrus research station in Ramsar between clementine mandarin and ‘Mexican’ lime (genotype B). Furthermore, at the Kotra citrus station (Mazandaran Province), controlled crosses were carried out between three female lemon parents (‘Eureka’, ‘Cook Eureka’, and ‘Lisbon’) and two sweet lime tetraploids (C and D).  For rescue of triploid embryos, seeds were extracted from the fruits of the crosses, washed, and sorted based on their size and weight. Only seeds weighing less than 0.09 g (very small seeds, presumed to be highly monoembryonic) were cultured on B5 medium supplemented with 3% sucrose, 0.7% agar, 0.5 g/L malt extract, and 1 mg/L GA₃.

 

Results and Dicussion

In tree A, four of the five main branches (A1, A2, A3, and A4), each with a primary flow cytometric peak, were diploid (2n=2X). Only one main branch (A5) exhibited two distinct peaks, indicating a mixoploid (2X+4X) status.  In tree B, all seven main branches were uniformly triploid (2n=3X). The leaves of tree B (triploid) were larger and thicker compared to those of tree A (mainly diploid, except A5), with shorter petioles and more scattered stomata. Fruits from one of the branches in tree B (B4) contained an average of two seeds. Since tree B is triploid and its seedlessness holds commercial value, it is essential to propagate each of its branches vegetatively for maintenance, further study, and use in breeding programs.  Crosses between clementine mandarin and ‘Mexican’ lime produced no fruit or seeds. However, crosses involving three lemon female parents (‘Eureka,’ ‘Cook Eureka,’ and ‘Lisbon’) with tetraploid sweet limes resulted in fruit production. The embryos derived from these crosses, cultured in B5 medium supplemented with 1.5 mg/l GA3, showed the highest germination percentage and shortest germination time.  Thirty-five days after in vitro germination, the seedlings were transferred to ex vitro conditions. Of the 15 seedlings analyzed for ploidy via flow cytometry, ten were diploid (nucellar), and five were triploid (2n=3X). Specifically, four seedlings originated from the ‘Eureka’ × sweet lime cross, and one from the ‘Cook Eureka’ × sweet lime cross.  Future efforts should focus on further studying these triploid seedlings, especially their fruit characteristics, to evaluate their potential as new citrus cultivars for commercial production.

 

Conclusion

    From crosses between diploid lemon cultivars ‘Eureka’ and ‘Cook Eureka’ (female parents) and tetraploid sweet lime (male parent), a total of five triploid genotypes were obtained. These genotypes should be further evaluated for their phenotypic characteristics in future studies.  For this purpose, we suggeste that the triploid genotypes from this study be propagated onto sour orange or citrumelo rootstocks to ensure their preservation and to produce sufficient plant material for further research

 

Author Contributions

  1. Jalilzadeh and A. Asadi Abkenar conceived and planned the experiments. S. Bohlouli Zanjani,   A. Hashempour, E. Jalilzadeh  and  A. Asadi Abkenar  carried out the experiments. E. Jalilzadeh  and  A. Asadi Abkenar analyzed data. Elham Jalilzadeh  and  Asad Asadi Abkenar wrote the first manuscript. Parisa Jonoubi and Reza Fifaei contributed to the interpretation of the results. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.

 

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the authors.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of postharvest laboratory of Citrus and Subropical Research Institute of Iran (Ramsar), especially K. Najafi Hir (Retiried) and E. Seyedghasemi.

 

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

 

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
Aleza, P.; Juarez, J.; Ollitrault, P. & Navarro, L. (2009). Production of tetraploid plants of non-apomictic citrus genotypes. Plant Cell Reports, 28(12), 1837-1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0783
Aleza, P.; Juarez, J.; Ollitrault, P. & Navarro, L. (2010). Polyembryony in non-apomictic citrus genotypes. Annals of Botany, 106(4): 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1078/0304-4238-106.4.533
Aleza, P.; Juárez, J.; Cuenca, J.; Ollitrault, P. & Navarro, L. (2012). Extensive Citrus triploid hybrid production by 2x×4x sexual hybridizations and parent-effect on the length of the juvenile phase. Plant Cell Reports, 31(9): 1723-1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1269-9
Afshar Mohammadian, M.; Pourakbari Kasmaei, R.; Omidi, Z.; Ghanati, F. & Tarang, A. (2012). Morphologic and physiologic effects on polyploidy induction in Citrus aurantifolia. Journal of Plant Biology, 12(4): 13-24. [In Persian].
Afshar Mohammadian, M.; Omidi, Z.; Pourakbari, K. R.  & Asadi Abkenar, A. (2013). The effect of polyploidy on some anatomical and antioxidant characteristics of Citrus aurantifolia. Journal of Plant Research, 26(3): 238-246. [In Persian].
Asadi Abkenar, A. (2014). Selection in seedlings with open- pollination origin in some acid citrus accessions (For tolerance to Witches’ Broom Disease of Lime). Final report of project. Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII) – Branch of North Region – Rasht. [In Persian].
Bacchi, O. (1940). Observacoes citológicas em Citrus. I. Número de cromossômios de algumas espécies e variedades. Jornal de Agronomia Piracicaba, 3: 249-258.
Barry, G. H.; Caruso, M. & Gmitter Jr., F. G. (2020). Commercial scion varieties. In The genus citrus. edited by Talon, M., Caruso, M. & Gmitter Jr., F. G. Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier. United Kingdom: 83-104.
Brewbaker, J. L. & Kwack, B. H. (1963). The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. American Journal of Botany, 50(9): 859-865.
Caruso, M.; Smith, M. W.; Froelicher, Y.; Russo, G. & Gmitter Jr., F. G. (2020). Traditional breeding. In The genus Citrus. edited by Talon, M., Caruso, M. & Gmitter Jr., F. G. Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier. United Kingdom: 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818742-4.00008-6
Esen, A.; Soost, R. K. & Geraci, G. (1979). Genetic evidence for the origin of diploid megagametophytes in Citrus. Journal of Heredity, 70: 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109213
FAO. (2021). Citrus fruit fresh and processed statistical bulletin 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Gmitter, F. G.; Grosser, J. W.; Castle, W. S. & Moore, G. A. (2007). Comprehensive citrus genetic improvement programme. In Citrus Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. edited by Khan, I. A. Oxford, CAB International: 9-19.
Golein, B. (2016a). Khoram, new mandarine cultivar for citrus growing region of north of Iran. Poster paper of fruit culture presented in the 9th Congress of Iranian Horticultural Science, Ahvaz, Iran. [In Persian].
Golein, B. (2016b). Introduction of early ripening mandarin, Jahangir. Poster paper of fruit culture, presented in the 9th Congress of Iranian Horticultural Science, Ahvaz, Iran. [In Persian].
Grosser, J. W.; Barthe, G. A.; Castle, B.; Gmitter, F. G. & Lee, O. (2015). The development of improved tetraploid citrus   rootstocks to facilitate advanced production systems and sustainable citriculture in Florida. Acta Horticulturae, 1065: 319-327. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1065.37
Guerra, D.; Wittmann, M. T. S.; Schwarz, S. F.; Souza (de), P. V. D.; Gonzatto, M. P. & Weiler, R. L. (2014). Comparison between diploid and tetraploid citrus rootstocks: morphological characterization and growth evaluation. Bragantia Campinas, 73(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052014000100001
Guerra, D.; Wittmann, M. T. S.; Schwarz, S. F.; Weiler, R. L.; Dahmer, N. & de Souza, P. V. D. (2016). Tetraploidization in citrus rootstocks: effect of genetic constitution and environment in chromosome duplication. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 16: 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n1a6
Iglesias, D. J.; Tadeo, F. R.; Primo-Millo, E. & Talon, M. (2006). Carbohydrate and ethylene levels related to fruitlet drop through abscission zone A in citrus. Trees, 20: 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0443-7
Jiang, J.; Yang, N.; Li, L.;, Qin, G.; Ren, K.; Wang, H.; Deng, J. & Ding, D. (2022). Tetraploidy in Citrus wilsonii enhances drought tolerance via synergistic regulation of photosynthesis, phosphorylation, and hormonal changes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 875011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.875011
Khan, I. A. & Kender, W. J. (2007). Citrus breeding: Introduction and objectives. In: Citrus Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology. edited by Khan, I. A. CAB International, Oxford: 1-8.
Kiran, K. N.; Awater, S.; Sanjay, K. S.; Awasthi, O. P.; Navinder, S. & Athmika, J. P. T. (2024). Characterization of second generation colchiploids in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) cv. Mosambi with respect to morpho-physio-biochemical traits. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94 (9): 971–976. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v94i9.XXXXX
Lora, J.; Garcia-Lor, A. & Aleza, P. (2022). Pollen development and viability in diploid and doubled diploid citrus species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 862813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.862813
Mathur, J. & Koncz, C. (1997). Method for preparation of epidermal imprints using agarose. Bio Techniques, 22(2): 280-282.
Moore, G. A. (2001). Oranges and lemons: clues to the taxonomy of Citrus from molecular markers. Trends in Genetics, 17: 536-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02384-3
Narukulla, V.; Lahane, Y.; Uge, P.; Pandey, S.; Fiske, K.; Kawale, K.; Jagannadham & Ziogas, V. (2024). Production of triploid teedless tweet Orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] cv. Mosambi: A tuccess ttory. Agronomy, 14(4): 829.
Nukaya, T.; Sudo, M.; Yahata, M.; Nakajo, Y.; Ohta, T.; Yasuda, K.; Tominaga, A.; Mukai, H. & Kunitake, H. (2019). Characteristics in autotetraploid kumquats (Fortunella spp.) induced by colchicine treatment to nucellar embryos and their utilization for triploid breeding. Scientia Horticulturae, 245: 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.010
Oiyama, I.; Okudai, N. & Takahara, T. (1981). Ploidy levels of seedlings obtained from 2x×4x crosses in citrus. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1: 32-34.
Perez -Tornero, O. & Porras, I. (2008). Assessment of polyembryony in lemon: rescue and in vitro culture of immature embryos. Plant, Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 93: 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9414-5
Ray, P. K. (2002). Citrus. In: Breeding Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Springer-Verlag Narosa Publishing House: 338.
Raza, H. & Khan, M. (2003). Seedlessness in citrus (A review). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 5: 388-391. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.ijab/2003.5.3.388.391
Reforgiato, G. R.; Russo, G. & Recupero, S. (2005). New promising Citrus triploid hybrids selected from crosses between monoembryonic diploid female and tetraploid male parents. HortScience, 40(3): 516-520. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.516
Roverssi, F.; Cavichioli, T. M.; Curtolo, M.; Latado, R. R. & Yaly, M. C. (2022). Number of seeds in fruits and frequency of hybrids obtained in crossings with IAC 2019 Maria mandarin. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 44(1): 1-11. https://doi/org/10.1590/0100-29452022008
Ruiz, M.; Pina, J. A.; Alcayde, E.; Morillon, R.; Navarro, L. & Primo-Millo, E. (2015). Behavior of diploid and tetraploid genotypes of 'Carrizo' citrange under abiotic stress. 12th International Citrus Congress, Valencia, Spain.
Russo, G.; Reforgiato, G. R.; Recupero, S. & Paolo, D. P. (2015). ʻSweet Sicilyʼ and ʻEarly Sicilyʼ, two new triploids from the program of CRA-research centre of citriculture and Mediterranean crops. Proc. XIIth Intl. Citrus Congress. Acta Horticulturae, 1065: 215-221. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1065.25
Santos, M. G.; Passos, O. S.; Soares Filho, W. S.; Girardi, E. A.; Gesteira, A. S. & Ferreira, C. F. (2013). Variability analysis of ʻPersianʼ acid lime tree selections using agronomic and molecular markers. Genetics and Molecular Research. 12(4): 4604-4614. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.December.12.14
Starrantino, A. & Recupero, G. R. (1981). Citrus hybrids obtained in vitro from 2x females × 4x males. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1: 31-32.
Tan, F. Q.; Tu, H.; Liang, W. J.; Long, J. M.; Wu, X. M.; Zhang, H. Y. & Guo, W. W. (2015). Comparative metabolic and transcriptional analysis of a doubled diploid and its diploid citrus rootstock (C. junos cv. Ziyang xiangcheng) suggest its potential value for stress resistance improvement. BMC plant Biology, 15: 89. https://doi.org/10:1186/s12870-015-0450-4
Wakana, A. (1981). Seed development in relation to ploidy of zygotic embryo and endosperm in polyembryonic Citrus. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 1: 35-39.
Wakana, A.; Hanada, N.; Park, S. M.; Fukudome, I., & Kajiwara, K. (2005). Production of tetraploid forms of acid citrus cultivars by top grafting of shoots with sprouting axially buds treated with colchicine. Journal of Faculty of Agriclture of Kyushu University, 50(1), 93-102.
Xia, Q.; Wang, W.; Xie, K.; Wu, X.; Deng, X.; Grosser, J. W. & Guo, W. (2021). Unreduced megagametophyte formation via second division restitution contributes to tetraploid production in interploidy crosses with ʻOrahʼ mandarin (Citrus reticulata). Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineerig, 8(2), 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frontiers.2020.12.008