Morphological Evaluation of Some Caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) Genotypes in Fars Province

Document Type : Full Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Fig Research Station, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Training Center, AREEO, Estahban, Iran

Abstract

Since the investigation of characteristics of genotypes and cultivars is the first step in breeding projects, this study was conducted to evaluate 41 morphological and physiological characteristics and 7 qualitative characteristics of caprifig cultivars (Sibi, Khakestooni, Atashi, Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi), based on a completely randomized block design with three replications. The results showed that tree growth habit was in two forms of semi-erect (Khakestooni, Atashi, Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi) and spread (Sibi). Cultivars formed three groups based on the dominant type of leaves, that included entire (without lobes) (Khakestooni), three-lobed (Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi) and five-lobed (Atashi and Sibi). The fruit shape was predominantly pyriform, which was observed in Atashi, Daneh-Sefid and Koohi cultivars. The maximum fruit length and width were in Atashi cultivar (21.33 mm and 22.33 mm, respectively). The fruit neck length was long in Atashi cultivar and the fruit weight was the highest in Sibi cultivar. The Fruit skin ground colour showed strong diversity, including green-yellow in Sibi, Daneh-Sefid and Pozdenbali cultivars, purple in Koohi and Atashi cultivars, and violet in Khakestooni cultivar. The fruit number per branch was low in all cultivars except Koohi. The number of pollens inside the fruit was highly variable among cultivars, including low in Atashi and Sibi, moderate in Khakestooni and Daneh-Sefid, and high in Pouzdonbali and Koohi. There was the highest number of male and female Blastophaga wasp in Khakestooni cultivar. Our study demonstrated great morphological and physiological variation among the caprifig cultivars, which makes them valuable genetic resources to incorporate into breeding programs in addition to their use for caprification.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Extended Abstract

Introduction

Fig (Ficus carica L.) belongs to the Moraceae family. The fig trees are cultivated for their fruits in warm and dry climates. Fig is a gynodioecious species, and thus many varieties require pollination to produce fruits, a process known as caprification. Caprification is the pollination of long-styled female flowers of the edible fig by Blastophaga psenes L. wasps carrying the pollen from the profichi of the caprifig (F. carica var. caprificus Risso). Caprifig trees with high quality pollen are essential for good yields.

The development of new cultivars of fruits critically depends on breeders and growers having access to the genetic diversity in order to develop cultivars with higher yields, resistant to pests and diseases, tolerant to abiotic stresses, making more efficient use of resources, and producing new and better quality products. In fact, characterization based on morphological parameters is usually affected by ecological conditions and agronomic practices, however these attributes are a greatly suggested first step in advance of beginning biochemical or molecular evaluations.

Materials and methods

 The experiment was carried out in the Fig Research Station, Estahban, Iran. In this research, 38 morphological characteristics and 7 qualitative characteristics of caprifig (Sibi, Khakestooni, Atashi, Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi) cultivars were investigated. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized block design with three replications. Data were analysed using the SAS software (Ver. 9.4) and significant differences among the mean values were compared by DMRT at P≤0.05.

 

Results and discussion

 The results of morphological and physiological study showed that tree growth habit was semi-erect (Khakestooni, Atashi, Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi cultivars) and spread (Sibi cultivar). Cultivars formed three groups based on the dominant type of leaves, that included entire (without lobes) (Khakestooni), three-lobed (Pouzdonbali, Daneh-Sefid, and Koohi) and five-lobed (Atashi and Sibi). The fruit shape was predominantly pyriform, which was observed in Atashi, Daneh-Sefid and Koohi cultivars. The maximum fruit length and width were in Atashi cultivar (21.33 mm and 22.33 mm, respectively). The longest fruit neck length was measured in Atashi cultivar and the highest fruit weight was obtained in Sibi cultivar. The fruit skin ground colour showed strong diversity, including green-yellow in Sibi, Daneh-Sefid and Pozdenbali cultivars, purple in Koohi and Atashi cultivars, and violet in Khakestooni cultivar. All cultivars except Koohi had a low fruit number per branch in. The number of pollens inside the fruit was highly variable, including low in Atashi and Sibi cultivars, moderate in Khakestooni and Daneh-Sefid cultivars, and high in Pouzdonbali and Koohi cultivars. There was the highest number of male and female Blastophaga in Khakestooni cultivar. The maximum chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were recorded in the Sibi cultivar. The anthocyanin content in Atashi cultivar was the greatest in comparision with other cultivars (0.031 µmol/g). Extract fruit pH varied from 6.05 to 6.64 with the greatest value in Daneh-Sefid cultivar. Total soluble solids (TSS) ranged from 9.31 to 10.92 °Brix. The highest TSS was recorded in Khakestooni cultivar. Khakestooni (0.20%) and Pouzdonbali (0.07%) had the maximum and minimum content of titratable acidity, respectively.

This study provided critical insights into the morphological diversity of Ficus carica var. caprificus as a key pollinator species for edible figs. As figs are economically important in many regions, understanding the genetic variability among caprifigs can significantly impact fig fruit production and quality by enhancing breeding and cultivation practices. The fruit morphology showed considerable diversity, with predominantly pyriform shapes observed among several cultivars. This shape may affect the pollination efficiency and subsequent fruit set, emphasizing the need for extensive characterization to enhance breeding strategies. Interestingly, the Atashi cultivar exhibited the largest fruits, which could indicate a potential target for breeders aiming to enhance fig size in edible varieties. The findings regarding chlorophyll and carotenoid contents suggest that certain genotypes, like Sibi, have the potential for increasing photosynthetic efficiency, contributing to better growth and higher yields. Future breeding strategies can leverage this morphological and physiological knowledge to introduce desirable traits into edible fig varieties, ultimately enhancing agricultural productivity and sustainability.

 

Conclusion

 Our study revealed significant morphological variation among the caprifig cultivars, which makes them valuable genetic resources for incorporation in breeding programs, in addition to their utilization for caprification.

احمدی، کریم.، عبادزاده، ح.، حاتمی، فرشاد.، و عبدشاه، هلدا. (1401). آمارنامه کشاورزی، محصولات باغبانی. مرکز فنآوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات وزارت جهاد کشاورزی.

REFERENCES

Aljane, F., & Ferchichi, A. (2007). Characterization and evaluation of six cultivars of caprifig" Ficus carica" L.) in Tunisia. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, (151), 22-26.
Almajali, D. A., Abdel-Ghani, A. H., & Migdadi, H. (2012). Evaluation of genetic diversity among Jordanian fig germplasm accessions by morphological traits and ISSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 147, 8-19.
Aradhya, M. K., Stover, E., Velasco, D., & Koehmstedt, A. (2010). Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated fig (Ficus carica L.). Genetica, 138, 681-694.
Bilgin, N. A., Misirli, A., Belge, A., & Özen, M. (2020). The pollen and fruit properties of Ficus carica Caprificus. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(3), 1696-1705.
Çalişkan, O., & Polat, A. A. (2008). Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia horticulturae, 115(4), 360-367.
Çalişkan, O., & Polat, A. A. (2012). Morphological diversity among fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions sampled from the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36(2), 179-193.
Caliskan, O., Bayazit, S., Ilgin, M., & Karatas, N. (2017). Morphological diversity of caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) accessions in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey: Potential utility for caprification. Scientia Horticulturae, 222, 46-56.
Caliskan, O., Bayazit, S., Ilgin, M., & Karatas, N. (2018). Characterization of caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus) accessions selected from various locations in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, JAFES, 72(1), 203-207.
Chatti, K., Salhi-Hannachi, A., Mars, M., Marrakchi, M., & Trifi, M. (2004). Analyse de la diversité génétique de cultivars tunisiens de figuier (Ficus carica L.) à l'aide de caractères morphologiques. Fruits, 59(1), 49-61.
Del Caro, A., & Piga, A. (2008). Polyphenol composition of peel and pulp of two Italian fresh fig fruits cultivars (Ficus carica L.). European Food Research and Technology, 226, 715-719.
Essid, A., Aljane, F., & Ferchichi, A. (2017). Morphological characterization and pollen evaluation of some Tunisian ex situ planted caprifig (Ficus carica L.) ecotypes. South African Journal of Botany, 111, 134-143.
Fatahi, S., Cheghamirza, K., Arji, I., & Zarei, L. (2017). Evaluation of genetic variation of common fig (Ficus carica L.) in West of Iran. Journal of Medicinal plants and By-product, 6(2), 229-240.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. )2022(. FAOSTAT Database. Rome, Italy. FAO. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
Gaaliche, B., Saddoud, O., & Mars, M. (2012). Morphological and pomological diversity of fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars in northwest of Tunisia. International Scholarly Research Network, Agronomy, 1-9.
Giraldo, E., López-Corrales, M., & Hormaza, J. I. (2010). Selection of the most discriminating morphological qualitative variables for characterization of fig germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 135(3), 240-249.
Hiscox, J. D., & Israelstam, G. F. (1979). A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57(12), 1332-1334.
Hssaini, L., Charafi, J., Razouk, R., Hernández, F., Fauconnier, M. L., Ennahli, S., & Hanine, H. (2020a). Assessment of morphological traits and fruit metabolites in eleven fig varieties (Ficus carica L.). International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(2), 8-28.
Hssaini, L., Hanine, H., Razouk, R., Ennahli, S., Mekaoui, A., Guirrou, I., & Charafi, J. (2020b). Diversity screening of fig (Ficus carica L.) germplasm through integration of morpho-agronomic and biochemical traits. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(4), 939-958.
Jamali, B., & Amin, H. (2022). Comparison of 18 Iranian caprifig cultivars based on some morphological and biochemical parameters. Advances in Horticultural Science, 36(4), 303-314.
Jiménez-Gómez, C. P., Cecilia, J. A., Durán-Martín, D., Moreno-Tost, R., Santamaría-González, J., Mérida-Robles, J., & Maireles-Torres, P. (2016). Gas-phase hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol over Cu/ZnO catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 336, 107-115.
Khadivi-Khub, A., & Anjam, K. (2014). Characterization and evaluation of male fig (caprifig) accessions in Iran. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300, 2177-2189.
Khadivi-Khub, A., & Anjam, K. (2016). The relationship of fruit size and light condition with number, activity and price of Blastophaga psenes wasp in caprifigs. Trees, 30, 1855-1862.
Khan, M. R., Khan, M. A., Habib, U., Maqbool, M., Rana, R. M., Awan, S. I., & Duralija, B. (2022). Evaluation of the characteristics of native wild Himalayan fig (Ficus palmata Forsk.) from Pakistan as a potential species for sustainable fruit production. Sustainability, 14(1), 468.
Kim, D. O., Jeong, S. W., & Lee, C. Y. (2003). Antioxidant capacity of phenolic phytochemicals from various cultivars of plums. Food Chemistry, 81(3), 321-326.
Kokaj, T. (2021). Investigation and value of qualitative and quantitative characteristics 10 of genotypes of figs. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture. 5(3), 448-454.
Koşar, D. A., Koşar, M. B., & Ertürk, Ü. (2022). Effect of pollen sources on fruit set and quality of edible fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. ‘Bursa Siyahı’. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 50(3), 12831-12831.
Mirheidari, F., Khadivi, A., Moradi, Y., & Paryan, S. (2020). Phenotypic variability of naturally grown edible fig (Ficus carica L.) and caprifig (Ficus carica var. caprificus Risso) accessions. Scientia Horticulturae, 267, 109320.
Papadopoulou, K., Ehaliotis, C., Tourna, M., Kastanis, P., Karydis, I., & Zervakis, G. (2002). Genetic relatedness among dioecious Ficus carica L. cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, and evaluation of agronomic and morphological characters. Genetica, 114(2), 183-194.
Paul, V., Singh, A., and Pandey, R. (2010). Determination of Titrable acidity (TA). Post-Harvest Physiology of Fruits and Flowers, 44-45.
Pereira, C., Serradilla, M. J., Martín, A., del Carmen Villalobos, M., Pérez-Gragera, F., & López-Corrales, M. (2015). Agronomic behaviour and quality of six fig cultivars for fresh consumption. Scientia Horticulturae, 185, 121-128.
Podgornik, M., Vuk, I., Vrhovnik, I., & Mavsar, D. B. (2010). A survey and morphological evaluation of fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia. Scientia Horticulturae, 125(3), 380-389.
Rodrigues, M. G. F., Santos, T. P. D., Ferreira, A. F. A., Monteiro, L. N. H., Nakanishi, E. S., & Boliani, A. C. (2019). Morphological characterization of active germoplasm bank fig tree accessions. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura41, e-074.Salimpour, A., Shamili, M., Dadkhodaie, A., Zare, H., & Hadadinejad, M. (2019). Evaluating the salt tolerance of seven fig cultivars (Ficus carica L.). Advances in Horticultural Science, 33(4), 553-566.
Sánchez, M. J., Melgarejo, P., Hernández, F., & Martínez, J. J. (2003). Chemical and morphological characterization of four fig tree cultivars (Ficus carica L.) grown under similar culture conditions. Acta Horticulturae, 605, 33-36.
Simsek, E., Kilic, D., & Caliskan, O. (2020). Phenotypic variation of fig genotypes (Ficus carica L.) in the Eastern Mediterranean of Turkey. Genetika, 52(3), 957-972.
Simsek, M., & Yildirim, H. (2010). Fruit characteristics of the selected fig genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(37), 6056-6060.
Solomon, A., Golubowicz, S., Yablowicz, Z., Grossman, S., Bergman, M., Gottlieb, H. E., & Flaishman, M. A. (2006). Antioxidant activities and anthocyanin content of fresh fruits of common fig (Ficus carica L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(20), 7717-7723.
Teleb, S. S., & Salah-El-din, R. M. (2014). Pollen morphology of some species of genus Ficus from Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 54(1), 87-102.
Trad, M., Gaaliche, B., Renard, C. M. G. C., & Mars, M. (2013). Plant natural resources and fruit characteristics of fig (Ficus carica L.) change from coastal to continental areas of Tunisia. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, 3(2), 022-025.
Zare H. (2008). Comparison of fig caprification vessels, period and caprifig cultivar usable in Iran. Acta Horticulture 798, 233-240.