بررسی برخی واکنش‌های فیزیولوژیکی و بیوشیمیایی چند گونه رز بومی ایران به تنش کم‌آبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

2 استاد، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

3 استادیار، دانشکدگان کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

تنش خشکی یکی از عوامل محدود کننده توسعه فضای سبز می­باشد. به منظور بررسی پاسخ چهار گونه رز وحشی (Rosa canina،
R. beggeriana، R. orientalis و R. persica) به تنش کم‌آبی آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک­های کامل تصادفی با دو عامل گونه های رز و عامل دوم تنش کم‌آبی با سه سطح (شاهد (03/0-)، 8/0- (متوسط) و 5/1- (شدید) مگاپاسکال پتانسیل آب خاک) انجام شد. گیاهان یکساله حاصل از پاجوش­های گونه­های مذکور تحت تیمار تنش کم‌آبی قرار گرفتند. براساس نتایج وزن برگ در واحد سطح (LMA) بین گونه­ها متفاوت بود و تنش کم‌آبی بر آن اثری نداشت. تنش کم‌آبی موجب کاهش محتوای نسبی آب برگ (RWC)، شاخص عملکرد (PI)، مقدار کلروفیل و افزایش مقدار نشت یونی و مقدار مالون­دی­آلدهید (MDA) در R. persica شد. در گونه R. canina تنش کم‌آبی موجب کاهش RWC، PI و ظرفیت آنتی­اکسیدانی (DPPH) و افزایش مقدار نشت یونی و MDA شد. در گونه R. beggeriana تنش کم‌آبی سبب افزایش نشت یونی و ظرفیت آنتی­اکسیدانی شد و در بقیه صفات تفاوت نامحسوس بود. در گونه R. orientalis تنش کم‌آبی موجب تغییرات چندانی در صفات مورد بررسی نشد. بر اساس نتایج R. orientalis و سپس R. beggeriana به شرایط تنش کم‌آبی متحمل­تر هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of some physiological and biochemical reactions in some Iranian native roses ‎to water deficit stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • Neda Jalali 1
  • Rohangiz Naderi 2
  • Azizollah Khandan-Mirkohi 3
1 Ph. D. Candidate,, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran ‎
2 Professor, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran ‎
3 Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture & Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran ‎
چکیده [English]

Drought stress is one of limitation factors in landscape expantion. In order to investigate response of four wild roses species (Rosa canina, R. beggeriana, R. orientalis & R. persica) to water deficit, a factorial experiment was carried out in a completely randomized block design with two factors Rosa species and water deficit at three levels (control (-0.03), -0.8 (moderate) & -1.5 (Severe) MPa). One year old plant obtained from mentioned rose sucker were subjected to water deficit treatment. Based on the results, leaf mass area (LMA) was different between species and water deficit had no effect on that. Water deficit caused decreased relative leaf water content (RWC), performance index (PI), chlorophyll content and increased electric leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in R. persica. In R. canina RWC, PI and free radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) decreased and EL and MDA increased. In R. beggeriana EL and DPPH increased and in other characteristics difference was invisible. In R. orientalis water deficit had no dramatic effect on traits. Based on the results R. orientalis and then R. beggeriana are more tolerable to drought stress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Antioxidant capacity
  • chlorophyll
  • ‎‏ ‏drought
  • malondialdehyde

مراجع

  1. Ahmadizadeh, M., (2013). Physiological and agro-morphological response to drought stress. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13, 998-1009.
  2. Al Hassan, M., Martínez Fuertes, M., Ramos Sánchez, F.J., Vicente, O. & Boscaiu, M. (2015). Effects of salt and water stress on plant growth and on accumulation of osmolytes and antioxidant compounds in cherry tomato. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 43(1), 1-11.
  3. Amissah, L., Mohren, G.M.J., Kyereh, B. & Poorter, L. (2015). The effects of drought and shade on the performance, morphology and physiology of Ghanaian tree species. Plos One. 10(4), 1-22.
  4. Arabzadeh, E., Fotouhi Ghazviny, R., Rahmani, M. & Saadatian, M. (2017). Effects of irrigation period on biochemical changes of some citrus species. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 82(1), 33-38.
  5. Bajji, M., Kinet, J.M. & Lutts, S. (2002a). The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat. Plant Growth Regulation, 36(1), 61-70.
  6. Bajji, M., Kinet, J.M. & Lutts, S. (2002b). Osmotic and ionic effects of NaCl on germination, early seedling growth and ion content of Atriplex halimus (Chenopodiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 297-304.
  7. De Dauw, K., Van Labeke, M.C, Leus, L. & Van Huylenbroeck, J. (2013). Drought tolerance screening of a Rosa population. Acta Horticulturae. 990, 121-128.
  8. de la Riva, E.G., Olmo, M., Poorter, H., Ubera, J.L. & Villar, R. (2016). Leaf mass per area (LMA) and its relationship with leaf structure and anatomy in 34 mediterranean woody species along a water availability gradient. Plos One, 11, 1-18.
  9. Dhanda, S.S., Sethi, G.S. & Behl, R.K. (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 6-12.
  10. Eugenia, M., Nunes, S. & Ray Smith, G. (2003). Electrolyte leakage assay capable of quantifying freezing resistance in rose clover. Crop Science, 43, 1349-1357.
  11. Falchi, M., Bertelli, A., Lo Scalzo, R., Morassut, M., Morelli, R., Das, S., Cui, J. & Das, D.K. (2006). Comparison of cardioprotective abilities between the flesh and skin of grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 6613-6622.
  12. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Lee, D., Ito, O., & Siddique, K.H.M. (2009). Advances in drought resistance of rice. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28, 199–217.
  13. Farzam, M., (2009). Study of challenges ahead agriculture (Water challenge). Agricultural Planning, Economic and Rural Development Research Institute (APERDRI). (In Farsi).
  14. Flexas, J. & Medrano, H. (2002). Energy dissipation in C3 plants under drought. Functional Plant Biology, 29, 1209-1215.
  15. Gault, S.M. & Synge, P.M. (1987). The disctionary of roses in colours. Published on collaboration with the Royal Horticultural Society and The National Rose Society
  16. Gholami, M. & Rahemi, M. (2010). Effect of water stress and recovery on the water status and osmotic adjustment of miniature rose Meshkinjan. Research Journal of Environmental Science. 4, 288-293.
  17. Gholami, M., Rahemi, M. & Rastegar, S. (2012). Use of rapid screening methods for detecting drought tolerant cultivars of fig (Ficus carica). Scientia Horticulturae, 143, 7-14.
  18. Goncalves, J.F.C. & Santos, U.M. (2005). Utilization of the chlorophyll a fluorescence technique as a tool for selecting tolerant species to environment of high irradiance. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17, 307-313.
  19. Halevy, A.H. (1986). Rose research- current situation and future needs . Acta Horticulturae, 189, 11-20.
  20. Handerson-Cole, J. & Davies, F. (1993). Drought response of low and high maintenance landscape roses. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 11(2), 59-63.
  21. Hodges, D.M., DeLong, J.M., Forney, C.F., & Prange, R.K. (1999). Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta, 207, 604-611.
  22. Huang, W., Ratkowsky, D.A., Hui, C., Wang, P., Su, J. & Shi, P. (2019). Leaf fresh weight versus dry weight: which is better for describing the scaling relationship between leaf biomass and leaf area for broad-leaved plants? Forests, 10, 1-19.
  23. Jaleel, C.A., Gopi, R. & Panneerselvam, R. (2008). Growth and photosynthetic pigments responses of two varieties of Catharanthus roseus to triadimefon treatment. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331, 272-277.
  24. Karamanos, A.J. (1995). The involvement of proline and some metabolites in water stress and their importance as drought resistance indicators. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 21(2-3), 98-110.
  25. Kiani, S.P., Maury, P., Sarrafi. A. & Grieu, P. (2008). QTL analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant Science, 175, 565-573.
  26. Kocheva, K., Lambrev, P., Georgiev, G., Goltsev, V. & Karabaliev, M. (2004). Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence and membrane injury in the leaves of barley cultivars under osmotic stress. Bioelectrochemistry, 63, 121-124.
  27. Kocheva, K., Landjeva, S.P., & Georgiev, G.I. (2014). Variation in ion leakage parameters of two wheat genotypes with different Rht-B1 alleles in response to drought. Journal of Biosciences, 39(5), 753-759.
  28. Kusvuran, S. & Dasgan, H.Y. (2017). Drought induced physiological and biochemical responses in Solanum lycopersicum genotypes differing to tolerance. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 16(6), 19-27.
  29. Lawlor, D.W. & Cornic, G. (2002). Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell and Environment. 25, 275-294.
  30. Lea-Cox, J.D. & Ross, D.S. (2001). A review of the federal clean water act and the Maryland water quality improvement act: The rationale for developing a water and nutrient planning process for container nursery and greenhouse operations. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 19, 226-229.
  31. Lee, A.C.K., Jordan, H.C. & Horsley, J. (2015). Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and well being: prospects for planning. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 8, 131-137.
  32. Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology, 148, 350-382.
  33. Loggini, B., Scartazza, A., Brugnoli, E. & Navari Izzo, F. (1999). Antioxidative defense system pigment composition and photosynthetic efficiency in two wheat cultivars subjected to drought. Plant Physiology, 119, 1091-1100.
  34. Mansori, M., Chernane, H., Latique, S., Benaliat, A., Hsis- sou, D. & El Kaoua, M. (2015). Seaweed extract effect on water deficit and antioxidative mechanisms in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris). Journal of Applied Phycology, 27(4), 1689-1698.
  35. Mirjalili, S.A., (2005). Plants in stressful environments. Noorbakhch Publication. (In Farsi).
  36. Mishra, K., Ojha, H. & Chaudhury, N.K. (2012). Estimation of antiradical properties of antioxidants using DPPH assay: A critical review and results. Food Chemistry, 130, 1036-1043.
  37. Mishra, N. & Gupta, A.K. (2006). Effect of salinity and different nitrogen sources on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and indole alkaloid content in catharantus roseus seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology, 163, 11-18.
  38. Miyashita, K., Tanakamaru, S., Maitani, T. & Kimura, K. (2005). Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 53, 205-214.
  39. Moghadam, M., Alirezaei Noghondar, M., Selahvarzi, Y. & Goldani, M. (2015). The effect of drought stress on some morphological and physicochemical characteristics of three cultivars of basil (Ocimum basilicum). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 46(3), 507-521. (In Farsi).
  40. Neumann, P.M. (1995). The role of cell wall adjustments in plant resistance to water deficits. Crop Science. 35, 1258-1266.
  41. Niu, G. & Rodriguez, D.S. (2009). Growth and physiological responses of four rose rootstocks to drought stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 134(2), 202-209.
  42. Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S. & Mackay, W. (2008). Growth and physiological responses to drought stress in four oleander clones. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 133, 188-196.
  43. Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S. & Wang, Y.T. (2006). Impact of drought and temperature on growth and leaf gas exchange of six bedding plant species under greenhouse conditions. HortScience, 41, 1408-1411.
  44. Ogren, E. (1990). Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe for drought stress in willow leaves. Plant Physiology, 93, 1280-1285.
  45. Ozkur, O., Ozdemir, F., Bor, M. & Turkan I. (2009). Physiochemical and antioxidant responses of the perennial xerophyte Capparis ovata to drought. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 66, 487-492.
  46. Pérez-Pérez, J.G., Syvertsen, J.P., Botía, P, & García-Sánchez, F. (2007). Leaf water relations and net gas exchange responses of salinized Carrizo citrange seedlings during drought stress and recovery. Annals of Botany, 100(2), 335-345.
  47. Premachandra, G.S., Saneoka, H. & Ogata, S. (1989). Nutrio-physiological evaluation of polyethylene glycol test of cell membrane stability in maize. Crop Science, 29, 1287-1292.
  48. Rachmilevitch, S, Lambers, H. & Huang, B. (2006). Root respiratory characteristics associated with plant adaptation to high soil temperature for geothermal and turf‐type Agrostis species. Journal of Experimental Botany, 5, 623-631.
  49. Rahman, M.U., Gul, S. & Ahmad, I. (2004). Effects of water stress on growth and photosynthetic pigments of corn (Zea mays) cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 6, 652-655.
  50. Rechinger, K.Y. (1982). Flora Iranica. No. 152. Rosaceae II− Rosa.Akademische Verlagsanstalt, Graz, Austria. 6-30.
  51. Rostamabadi, A., Jalilvand, H., Nematzadeh, G., Goodarzi, M. & Sayad, E. (2016). Gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence yield in Iranian oak (Quercus macrantheraF & M) seedling under srought stress in Golestan province. Ecology of Iranian Forests, 4, 41-50. (in Farsi)
  52. Samiei, L., Naderi, R. & Khalighi, A. (2010). Genetic diversity and genetic similarities between Iranian rose species. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 85(3), 231-237.
  53. Samieiani, E., Ansari, H., Azizi M., Hashemi-Nia S.M. & Salahvarzi, Y. (2013). Effects of drought stress on some biochemical indices of four groundcovers (Lolium perenne, Potentilla spp, Trifolium repens and Frankenia spp) with potential usage in landscape. Journal of Science & Technology of Greenhouse Culture, 4(15), 101-109. (In Farsi).
  54. Sanchez-Rodriguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M., Cervilla, L.M., Blasco, B., Rios, J.J., Rosales, M.A., Romero, L. & Ruiz, J.M. (2010). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Science, 178, 30-40.
  55. Santos Sanchez, N.F., Salas-Coronado, R., Villanueva, C. & Hernandez-Calrlos, B. (2019). Antioxidant compounds and their antioxidant mechanism. In: E.A. Shalaby (Ed.), Antioxidants. (pp. 1-28) Intech Open.
  56. Soukhtesaraee, R., Ebadi, A., Salami, S.A. & Lesani, H. (2017). Evaluation of oxidative parameters in three grapevine cultivars under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science, 48(1), 85-98. (In Farsi).
  57. Sperdouli, I. & Moustakas, M. (2012). Interaction of proline, sugars, and anthocyanins during photosynthetic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 169, 577-585.
  58. Strauss, A.J., Krüger, G., Strasser, R.J. & Van Heerden, P.D. (2006). Ranking of dark chilling tolerance in soybean genotypes probed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient O-J-I-P. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56, 147-157.
  59. Taheri, S., Arghavani, M. & Mortazavi, S.N. (2017). The study of morphological, biochemical and physiological of bermuda grass as affected by sodium nitroprosside under water deficit stress. Journal of Crops Improvement, 19(2), 417-430. (In Farsi).
  60. Tahkokorpi, M., Taulavuori, K., Laine, K. & Taulavuori, E. (2007). After-effects of drought-related winter stress in previous and current year stems of Vaccinium myrtillus Environmental and Experimental Botany, 61, 85-93.
  61. Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. (1998). Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers. Sunderland, Massachussets.
  62. Tkalec, M., Paradikovic, N., Zeljkovic, S. & Vinkovic, T. (2012). Influence of medium on growth and development of wild rose in vitro. In: Proceeding of International Conference on BioScience: Biotechnology and Biodiversity. 18-20 June, Novi Sad, Serbia, pp. 104-108.
  63. Toscano, S., Scuderi, D., Giuffrida, F. & Romano, D. (2014). Responses of Mediterranean ornamental shrubs to drought stress and recovery. Scientia Horticulturae, 178, 145-153.
  64. Turner, N. (1981). Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil, 58, 339-366.
  65. Wang, Z. & Huang, B. (2004). Physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress. Crop Science, 44, 1729-1736.
  66. Weidner, S., Kordala, E., Brosowska-Arendt, W., Karamać, M, Kosińska, A. & Amarowicz, R. (2009). Phenolic compounds and properties of antioxidants in grapevine roots (Vitis vinifera) under low-temperature stress followed by recovery. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 78, 279-286.
  67. Zhu, Z., Liang, Z. & Han, R. (2009). Saikosaponin accumulation and antioxidative protection in drought-stressed Bupleurum chinense Plants Environmental and Experimental Botany, 66, 326-333.
  68. Zlesak, D.C. (2007). Rosa. In: N.O. Anderson (Ed), Flower breeding and genetics. (pp. 695-740.) Springer Science.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 دی 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 شهریور 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 اسفند 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار