بررسی اثر روش کشت نشایی و سوخچه بر تاریخ تشکیل سوخ و شاخص‌های رشد ژنوتیپ‏های پیاز

دارابی, عبدالستار

doi:10.22059/ijhs.2015.54134

بررسی اثر روش کشت نشایی و سوخچه بر تاریخ تشکیل سوخ و شاخص‌های رشد ژنوتیپ‏های پیاز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

عبدالستار دارابی

استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی بهبهان

10.22059/ijhs.2015.54134

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی اثر روش‏های کشت بر تاریخ تشکیل سوخ و شاخص‏های رشد ژنوتیپ‏های پیاز آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت‏های خرد‌شده در قالب طرح بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی بهبهان انجام گرفت. عامل اصلی دو روش کاشت: نشایی و سوخچه و عامل فرعی چهار ژنوتیپ: پیاز اصلاح‌شده بهبهان؛ تودۀ محلی رامهرمز؛ رقم تگزاس ارلی‏گرانو و پریماورا بود. تاریخ تشکیل سوخ به روش نسبت تشکیل سوخ و مجموع تجمعی تخمین زده شد. در روش کشت سوخچه، تاریخ تشکیل سوخ از تاریخ 28 دی‌ماه تا 21 بهمن‌ماه متغیر بود. در روش کشت نشایی، سوخ از تاریخ 22 بهمن‌ماه تا 9 اسفند‌ماه تشکیل شد. بیشترین سرعت رشد نسبی گیاه (094/0 گرم در گرم در روز) به پیاز اصلاح‌شدۀ بهبهان تعلق داشت. بیشترین سرعت رشد محصول (45/ 21 گرم در متر‌مربع در روز) و سوخ (97/25 گرم در متر‌مربع در روز) در رقم پریماورا مشاهده شد. بیشترین شاخص سطح برگ (21/5) به رقم تگزاس ارلی‌گرانو مربوط بود. بر‌اساس نتایج این آزمایش به‌منظور زودرس کردن پیاز در خوزستان کاشت رقم پریماورا به روش کشت سوخچه با میانگین عملکرد 17/80 تن در هکتار توصیه می‏شود.‏

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.2008482.1394.46.1.14.3

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the effect of transplant and set methods on bulbing date and growth indices of onion genotypes

نویسنده [English]

Abdosattar Darabi

Asistant Professor, Khuzestan Natural Sources and Agriculture Research, Scientific Board-Behbahan Agriculture Research Station

چکیده [English]

The current experiment was carried out to evaluate qualitative and quantitativeof three melons (Cucumis melo gp. Ameri) accssions named Zardjalal, Ananasi and Khanoti. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 16 treatments and three replications at research field of Jahad-e-Daneshgahi, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran. Five commercial cucurbit hybrids named Ace, Shintozwa, ShintoHongto, Zuktozwa and Ferro were used as rootstock. Non-grafted plants of Zardjalal, Ananasi and Khanoti were used as control. The results show that, rootstock and scion had significant effect on qualityandquantity traits. According to results, maximum numbers of fruits per plant (4.76 no) were related to Zardjalal accession on Zuktozwa rootstock. The high marketable fruits numbers (3.16 no) and high yield per plant (8.44 kg) belong to Zardjalal accession grafted onto Shintozwa rootstock to compare other accessions and rootstocks. Ananasi accession grafted on Zuktozwa rootstock had the highest diameter of the graft, scion diameter and rootstock diameter. Zardjalal and Ananasi accessions grafted on Zuktozwa rootstock had superlative shoot dry matter with 12.89 and 12.72%, respectively. Ananasi accession grafted on Zuktozwa rootstock had most fruit dry matter with 11.86%. The high cravity (9.5 mm) was seen in Zardjalal accession grafted on Zuktozwa rootstock. Ananasi accession grafted on Zuktozwa rootstock had the low fruit length, fruit diameter and flesh thickness. Ananasi accession with high brix (11%) was produced sweetest fruits.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Rootstock
scion
yield
zardjalal
ananasi
khatoni accession

مراجع

1. Ahn, S. J., Im, Y.J., Chung, G. C., Cho, B. H. & Suh, S. R. (1999). Physiological response of grafted-cucumber leaves and rootstock roots by low root temperature. Scientia Horticulturae,81, 397-408.
2. Chung, H. D. & Lee, J. M. (2007). Rootstocks for grafting. In: Horticulture in Korea. Korean Society for Horticultural Science, pp. 162-167.
3. Crin, P., LoBianco, C., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Saccardo, F. & Paratore, A. (2007). Evaluation of rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and gummy stem blight and effect on yield and quality of a grafted ‘Inodorus’ melon. HortScience, 42, 521-525.
4. Davis, A. R., Perkins-Veazie, P., Sakata, Y., Lopez-Galarza, S., Maroto, J. V., Lee, S. G., Huh, Y. C., Sun, Z., Miguel, A., King, S. R., Cohen, R. & Lee, J. M. (2008). Cucurbit grafting. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27, 50-74.
5. Edelstein, M., Burger, Y., Horev, C., Porat, A., Meir, A. & Cohen, R. (2004). Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomic variation of Cucurbita rootstocks on vigour, survival and yield of grafted melons. Journal of Horticultural Sciences & Biotechnology, 79, 370-374.
6. FAOSTAT. (2010). 23 June 2010. <http://faostat. fao.org/site/340/default.aspx>.
7. Hoyos, P. (2001). Influence of different rootstocks on the yield and quality of greenhouses grown cucumbers. Acta Horticulturae, 559, 139-143.
8. Kashi, A., Salehi, R. & Javanpour, R. (2008). Grafting technology in vegetable crop production (1^th Ed.). Agriculture Education Pub, 212 p. (In Farsi)
9. Kato, T. & Lou, H. (1989). Effect of rootstock on the yield, mineral nutrition and hormone level in xylem sap in eggplant. Journal of Japanese Society of Horticultural Sciences, 58, 345-352.
10. Koutsika-Sotiriou, M. & Traka-Mavrona, E. (2002). The cultivation of grafted melons in Greece, current status and prospects. Acta Horticulturae, 579, 325-330.
11. Lee, J. M. & Oda, M. (2003). Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews, 28, 127-134.
12. Lee, J. M. (1994). Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods and benefits. HortScience, 29, 235-239.
13. Lee, J. M., Kubota, C., Tsao, S. J., Bie, Z., Hoyos Echevarria, P., Morra, L. & Oda, M. (2010). Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 93-105.
14. Miguel, A. (1997). Injerto de hortalizas. Serie Divulgación Técnica. Consellería de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaciόn, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, 50-52.
15. Miguel, A., Maroto, J. V., Bautista, S. A., Baixauli, C., Cebolla, V., Pascual, B., Lopez- Galarza, S. & Guardiola, J. L. (2004). The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation by methyl bromide for control of Fusarium wilt. Scientia Horticulturae, 103, 9-17.
16. Miguel, A., Maroto, J. V., San Bautista, A., Baixauli, C., Cebolla, V., Pascual, B., Lopez-Galarza, S. & Guardiola, J. L. (2004). The grafting of triploid watermelon is an advantageous alternative to soil fumigation. Scientia Horticulturae, 103, 9-17.
17. Proietti, S., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., De Agazio, M., Zacchini, M., Moscatello, S. & Battistelli, A. (2008). Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88, 1107-1114.
18. Prohens, J. & Nuez, F. (2008). Handbook of Plant Breeding: Vegtables I. Springer Publishing. 426 pp.
19. Qi, H. Y., Li, T. L., Liu, Y. F. & Li, D. (2006). Effects of grafting on photosynthesis characteristics, yield, and sugar content in melon. Journal of Shenyang Agriculture University, 37, 155-158.
20. Rivero, R M., Ruiz, J. M. & Romero, L. (2003). Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stress conditions. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1, 70-74.
21. Rivero, R. M., Ruiz, J. M. & Romero, L. (2004). Iron metabolism in tomato and watermelon plants: influence of grafting. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 27, 2221-2234.
22. Sakata, Y., Takayoshi, O. & Mitsuhiro, S. (2007). The history and present state of the grafting of cucurbitaceous vegetables in Japan. Acta Horticulturae, 731, 159-170.
23. Salam, M. A., Masum, A. S. M. H., Chowdhury, S. S., Dhar, M., Saddeque, A. & Islam, M. R. (2002). Growth and yield of watermelon as influenced by grafting. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 298-299.
24. Salehi, R., Kashi, A., Lee, J. M., Babalar, M., Delshad, M., Lee, S. G. & Huh, Y. C. (2010). Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion concentration in xylem sap of Iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methods. HortScience, 45, 766-770.
25. Salehi, R., Kashi, A., Lee, S. G., Huh, Y. C., Lee, J. M., Babalar, M. & Delshad, M. (2009). Assessing the survival and growth performance of Iranian melon to grafting onto Cucurbita rootstocks. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 27(1), 1-6.
26. SAS Institute. (2004). SAS/STAT user´s guide. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
27. Seong, K. C., Moon, J. M., Lee, S. G., Kang, Y. G., Kim, K. Y. & Seo, H. D. (2003). Growth, lateral shoot development, and fruit yield of white-spined cucumber (Cucumis sativus cv. Baekseong-3) as affected by grafting methods. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology, 44, 478-482.
28. Soltani, A. (2007). Application SAS in statistical analysis. Mashhad University Press. 182 p. (In Farsi)
29. Wu, Y. F., Chen Y. & Zhao, Y. J. (2006)[r1] . Effect of pumpkin stocks on growth, development, yield, and quality of grafted muskmelon. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21, 354-359.
30. Xu, C. Q., Li, T. L., Qi, H. Y. & Qi, M. F. (2006). Effects of grafting on development and sugar content of muskmelon fruit. Journal of Shenyang Agriculture University, 37, 378-381.
31. Xu, C. Q., Li, T. L., Qi, H. Y. & Wang, H. (2005). Effects of grafting on growth and development, yield, and quality of muskmelon. China Vegetables, 6, 12-14.
32. Xu, S. L., Chen, Q. Y., Li, S. H., Zhang, L. L., Gao, J. S. & Wang, H. L. (2005). Roles of sugar-metabolizing enzymes and GA3, ABA in sugars accumulation in grafted muskmelon fruit. Journal of Fruit Science, 22, 514-518.
[r1]این منبع را در متن ندیدم؟؟؟